2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure of biofilms to slow flow fields: The convective contribution to growth and disinfection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We set in the "virtual grid points" u 0,j := u 1,j , u n+1,j := u n,j , u i,0 := u i,1 , u i,m+1 := u i,m and eliminate them from (18). The system of nm ordinary differential equations is integrated by the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method RKF4 (5).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We set in the "virtual grid points" u 0,j := u 1,j , u n+1,j := u n,j , u i,0 := u i,1 , u i,m+1 := u i,m and eliminate them from (18). The system of nm ordinary differential equations is integrated by the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method RKF4 (5).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the proof in [6] does not allow to compute quantitative estimates for η, so that we have to fall back on comparisons with computer simulations. For example, in the 2D and 3D simulations of the single-species growth model in [4,5,6], the solution reached values above u ≈ 0.99 but remained below u ≈ 0.9999, thus, we have the numerical estimatesη > 10 −4 . In all three cases the exponents in the biomass diffusion coefficient were a = b = 4 and the biofilm motility coefficient On the other hand the valueη := 1−ũ can be computed from (15).…”
Section: An Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lattice models with cellular automata-like rules for biofilm growth have predicted a wide range of biofilm morphologies [75], and also graphically demonstrated the advection of substrates around the fluid-biofilm interface [72]. Continuum representations of the biofilm as constitutively linear elastic [21,26,28,92], non-linear elastic [12,27], viscous [20], or viscoelastic [95] bodies is challenging as the interface must be tracked using stress and displacement matching; simplifications such as a one-way coupling or reduced dimensionality are sometimes employed. Interface tracking is not required for phase field models, which have been employed to argue that low matrix elasticity is required for streamers to form [94] and to investigate the role of cohesion on interface stabilisation [51].…”
Section: Fluid-structure Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved by the development of a novel three-layer flow model in a rectangular cross-section microchannel with relevant boundary conditions. This approach contributes a new focus on viscosity properties to the growing body of work using fluid mechanics modeling methods for biofilms, such as thin-film asymptotic model to describe biofilm growth, 12,13,56 mass transfer, 39 differential-discrete mathematical modelling of structure, 38 and others. 55 The approach opens the way for less intrusive, time-resolved studies of the effect of a range of physiochemical effects on biofilm mechanical properties, such as ionic strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%