2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(13)60427-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure measurement, risk assessment and source identification for exposure of traffic assistants to particle-bound PAHs in Tianjin, China

Abstract: a b s t r a c tTo investigate the levels of exposure to particulate-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and to estimate the risk these levels pose to traffic assistants (TAs) in Tianjin (a megacity in North China), a measurement campaign (33 all-day exposure samples, 25 occupational-exposure samples and 10 indoor samples) was conducted to characterize the TAs' exposure to PAHs, assess the cancer risk and identify the potential sources of exposure. The average total exposure concentration of 14 PAHs was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, reported ranges of estimated cancer risk related to cooking emissions include 2.5 × 10 −6 – 1.4 × 10 −5 for household cooking emissions 9 , 9.0 × 10 −5 – 1.13 × 10 −4 for night market workers 2 , and 1.96 × 10 −8 –1.31 × 10 −6 for frequent customers of six restaurants 27 . For comparison, examples of median or mean ILCRs reported in the literature included 2.96 × 10 −5 for inhalation exposure in temple workers 40 ; 1.055 × 10 −4 for traffic assistants (i.e., workers who assist police in controlling heavy traffic) 41 , 1.6 × 10 −5 in motorcycle commuters based on an estimated daily BaP eq of 0.40 μg/d 23 , and 2.3 × 10 −4 in topside coke oven workers based on personal exposure to 16 PAHs 35 . In comparison with other sources, cooking-related emissions showed a moderate cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, reported ranges of estimated cancer risk related to cooking emissions include 2.5 × 10 −6 – 1.4 × 10 −5 for household cooking emissions 9 , 9.0 × 10 −5 – 1.13 × 10 −4 for night market workers 2 , and 1.96 × 10 −8 –1.31 × 10 −6 for frequent customers of six restaurants 27 . For comparison, examples of median or mean ILCRs reported in the literature included 2.96 × 10 −5 for inhalation exposure in temple workers 40 ; 1.055 × 10 −4 for traffic assistants (i.e., workers who assist police in controlling heavy traffic) 41 , 1.6 × 10 −5 in motorcycle commuters based on an estimated daily BaP eq of 0.40 μg/d 23 , and 2.3 × 10 −4 in topside coke oven workers based on personal exposure to 16 PAHs 35 . In comparison with other sources, cooking-related emissions showed a moderate cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in the increase of the risk for the people living near the highway that had to be exposed daily [16]. Based on the previous research about the effect of the vehicles smoke for the traffic assistance that increased the chance of developing cancer [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once released into the atmosphere, most carcinogenic PAHs are predominantly contributors to PAH emissions in urban areas (Tuominen et al, 1988;Hanedar et al, 50 2014; Xue et al, 2014;Shen et al,2013). Since PAHs were mainly infiltrated from 51 the outdoor environment through fuel, coal and gasoline burning (Cheruiyot et 52 al.2015), more attention should be paid for the environment of transportation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%