2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure in vivo Induced Changes in Neural Circuitry for Pain-Related Fear: A Longitudinal fMRI Study in Chronic Low Back Pain

Abstract: Exposure in vivo (EXP) is a cognitive-behavioral treatment aimed at reducing pain-related fear in chronic pain, and has proven successful in reducing pain-related disability in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). The current longitudinal study aimed to reveal the neural correlates of changes in pain-related fear as a result of EXP. Twenty-three patients with cLBP were included in this study. Patients with cLBP underwent MRI scanning pre-treatment (pre-EXP), post-treatment (post-EXP), and 6 months after… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(116 reference statements)
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e interrupted visual information was detrimental to postural control in older adults [24] which increased the risk of falls in older adults to perform the balance test with eyes closed. is was also consistent with published studies which excluded adults who aged above 65 years old [25,26]. e study also imposed the criteria to include only right-handed participants only.…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…e interrupted visual information was detrimental to postural control in older adults [24] which increased the risk of falls in older adults to perform the balance test with eyes closed. is was also consistent with published studies which excluded adults who aged above 65 years old [25,26]. e study also imposed the criteria to include only right-handed participants only.…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In support of this notion recent evidence indicates an implicit bias towards “lifting with a flexed spine is dangerous”, compared to lifting with a neutral spine, in patients with persistent LBP as well as in the pain-free individuals [5,6]. Brain research further supports this by demonstrating distinct relationships between self-reports of pain-related fear and fear-related neural activity during observation of daily activities such as lifting with a flexed spine in LBP and pain-free subjects [35,36,57]. However, the underlying psychomotor interactions between pain-related fear and spinal motion are largely unknown and need to be elucidated to disentangle possible clinically relevant relationships between pain-related fear, spinal motion and negative outcomes such as persistent LBP and disability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 7 , 8 Brain research further supports this by demonstrating distinct relationships between self-reports of pain-related fear and fear-related neural activity during observation of daily activities such as lifting with a flexed spine in LBP and pain-free subjects. 37 , 38 , 62 However, the underlying interactions between pain-related fear and spinal motion are largely unknown and need to be elucidated to disentangle possible clinically relevant relationships between pain-related fear, spinal motion, and negative outcomes such as persistent LBP and disability. With respect to this, there is a lack of studies measuring lumbar spine flexion during lifting mimicking real-life settings, 55 especially with regards to psychological factors in people with and without LBP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%