2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure dose measurement during diagnostic pediatric X-ray examination using an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter based on precise dose calibration taking into consideration variation of X-ray spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy chosen for the calibration of the detector is important, as it is often very different from the energy received monthly. A correction factor must be taken into account 39 . However, this factor is based on an average theoretical energy received and not on the real exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy chosen for the calibration of the detector is important, as it is often very different from the energy received monthly. A correction factor must be taken into account 39 . However, this factor is based on an average theoretical energy received and not on the real exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will explain a procedure to determine dose calibration factors by taking into consideration the energy dependence of an OSL dosimeter and differences found in various x-ray spectra. Our previous study 16 aimed to derive a calibration factor used for general x-ray diagnosis, and the effects of beam hardening, scattered x-rays, and backscattering x-rays were evaluated. Namely, when an x-ray spectrum including the above effects is obtained, a proper calibration factor can be determined.…”
Section: A | Calibration Procedures Taking Into Consideration Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will describe the experimental procedure to deter- where "Counts" and "ϵ" were measured response and intrinsic detection sensitivity, respectively. 13,16 To reduce statistical uncertainty, three OSL dosimeters were individually irradiated at the above conditions, and each dosimeter was read five times using a commercially available reading device (microStar, Landauer, Inc., Illinois, USA). We adopted the mean value of Counts/ϵ for 15 readings.…”
Section: C | Experiments To Determine the Actual Calibration Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations