1995
DOI: 10.2172/93690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure assessment of groundwater transport of tritium from the Central Nevada Test Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on scoping-level calculations (Pohlmann et al, 1995), the downgradient model boundary is likely to extend no farther than the UC-3 withdrawn area, approximately six kilometers to the south ( Figure 5-1). …”
Section: Model Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on scoping-level calculations (Pohlmann et al, 1995), the downgradient model boundary is likely to extend no farther than the UC-3 withdrawn area, approximately six kilometers to the south ( Figure 5-1). …”
Section: Model Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pohlmann et al (1995) modeled potential migration of tritium away from the cavity and evaluated the risk due to tritium to an individual consuming groundwater for a lifetime centered around the peak tritium concentration as part of the Environmental Impact Statement for DOE activities in Nevada. Johnson et al (1996) employed the same scenario and transport parameters identified by Pohlmann et al (1995), but used a nuclear reactor computer code to calculate the source term. In addition, they considered risk due to cesium and strontium, but found that the risk due to these two contaminants is effectively zero.…”
Section: Corrective Action Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two analyses of the human health risk caused by migration of contaminants in groundwater from the Faultless cavity have been performed. Pohlmann et al (1995) modeled potential migration of tritium away from the cavity and evaluated the risk due to tritium to an individual consuming groundwater for a lifetime centered around the peak tritium concentration as part of the Environmental Impact Statement for DOE activities in Nevada. Johnson et al (1996) employed the same scenario and transport parameters identified by Pohlmann et al (1995), but used a nuclear reactor computer code to calculate the source term.…”
Section: Description Of Corrective Action Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount (if any) of unburned nuclear fuel (including isotopes of plutonium, uranium, and hydrogen) and the precise types and quantities of radionuclides produced are available in a classified report (Goishi et al, 1995), but unclassified analyses of groundwater from the post-shot well UC-1-P-2SR are publicly available (Thordarson, 1985;Davisson et al, 1994;Chapman et al, 1994). Using the unclassified data and estimates of chimney volume, Pohlmann et al (1995) calculated a tritium source term for the Faultless event of 4.3 x 10 pCi.…”
Section: Historic Waste Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early evaluations were not considered sufficient for the EIS, so DOE decided to perform a new exposure assessment for the Shoal site. A separate evaluation of the Central Nevada Test Area was also performed and is reported by Pohlmann et al (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%