2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exporting the problem: Issues with fishing closures in seabird conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They analyzed the relationship between seabird bycatch and distance of vessels from the closure boundary and found that most seabird interactions with trawlers occurred in clustered aggregations along the boundary line. They also found more intense foraging of black-browed albatross (Thalassarche melanophris) and southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus) near the closure boundary than away from it or inside the closure area (Copello et al 2016). The authors noted that there are no oceanographic fronts (i.e., areas with high productivity that typically attract seabird foraging) along the closure boundary and that the increased foraging was not associated with natural prey items.…”
Section: Mapping and Modeling Of Spatial And Temporal Seabird-fisheries Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They analyzed the relationship between seabird bycatch and distance of vessels from the closure boundary and found that most seabird interactions with trawlers occurred in clustered aggregations along the boundary line. They also found more intense foraging of black-browed albatross (Thalassarche melanophris) and southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus) near the closure boundary than away from it or inside the closure area (Copello et al 2016). The authors noted that there are no oceanographic fronts (i.e., areas with high productivity that typically attract seabird foraging) along the closure boundary and that the increased foraging was not associated with natural prey items.…”
Section: Mapping and Modeling Of Spatial And Temporal Seabird-fisheries Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although predictive models can be useful to examine potential outcomes from time-area fishing restrictions, consequences associated with single species management objectives need to be considered. Copello et al (2016) examined the distribution, bycatch rates, and foraging behavior of seabirds inside and outside of the Argentine hake closure to determine the impacts of a 'boundary effect' from concentrated fishing effort. The Argentine hake fishery closure, a ∼120,000km 2 fishery exclusion area on the Patagonia shelf, was implemented in the mid-1990s to protect Argentine hake (Merluccius hubssi).…”
Section: Mapping and Modeling Of Spatial And Temporal Seabird-fisheries Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, southern giant petrels and black-browed albatrosses may show certain differences in their foraging behaviors with respect to areas inside and outside the permanent Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi fishing closure in the Patagonian Shelf (see Section 3.2). The bulk of the core foraging areas of these species were concentrated in waters adjacent to the fishing closure where the fishing effort is higher than in other areas of the shelf [38]. Besides, this fishing closure produced a redistribution of the seabird bycatch creating a "boundary effect" due to the concentration of the fishing effort in the limits of the closure.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Overlap Between Seabirds And Fishing Acmentioning
confidence: 99%