2013
DOI: 10.3386/w19403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exporting Liquidity: Branch Banking and Financial Integration

Abstract: Using exogenous deposit windfalls from oil and natural gas shale discoveries, we demonstrate that bank branch networks help integrate U.S. lending markets. We find that banks exposed to shale booms increase their mortgage lending in non-boom counties by 0.93% per 1% increase in deposits. This effect is present only in markets where banks have branches and is strongest for mortgages that are hard to securitize. Our findings suggest that contracting frictions limit the ability of arm's length finance to integrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
103
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently with the findings of the international banking literature, the U.S. laboratory provides evidence that banks can act as shock absorbers or shock amplifiers by moving resources across branches following local demand shocks (e.g. Cortes and Strahan, 2014; Gilje et al, 2016), and local supply shocks (e.g. Campello, 2001;Ashcraft, 2006;Huang, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Consistently with the findings of the international banking literature, the U.S. laboratory provides evidence that banks can act as shock absorbers or shock amplifiers by moving resources across branches following local demand shocks (e.g. Cortes and Strahan, 2014; Gilje et al, 2016), and local supply shocks (e.g. Campello, 2001;Ashcraft, 2006;Huang, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…(, )). A related recent strand of literature argues that, despite significant improvements in financial innovations, such as securitization over the past few years, the location of the branch network still matters for a bank's investment decisions (Gilje, Loutskina, and Strahan ()). Our paper contributes to this work by arguing that these dimensions play a critical role in the allocation of failed banks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that there is no reason for a bank to decrease its deposit demand in one branch, but increase it in another branch. Empirical evidence in the banking literature also supports this intuition (Gilje et al, 2016;Drechsler et al, 2017). Therefore, the bank demand for deposits stays constant across its branches, which allows us to measure the impact of UI benefits on household deposit supply.…”
Section: Within County-pair Estimationmentioning
confidence: 71%