1995
DOI: 10.1525/as.1995.35.9.01p00532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Export Processing Zones in Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift in accountability to lateral networks instead of the more traditional vertical lines of national authority creates conditions where the nominal increase of exports and investment achieved through export zones is offset by negative economic impacts on the host country: Low skill, modular zones of the kind described above encourage dependence on import substitution at the expense of local suppliers, disrupt local communities and change labor patterns to the disadvantage of the poor (even as they create employment), and provide inadequate urban infrastructures in the face of the massive influx of workers, often causing environmental problems in the process (Amirahmadi and Wu, 1994). To transform an economy and sustain high levels of export, zones must, mainstream economists such as Amirahmadi and Wu (1994: 832) argue, connect to regional policies and act as portals to generalize a liberal trade regime to the whole country.…”
Section: Towards a Typology Of Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shift in accountability to lateral networks instead of the more traditional vertical lines of national authority creates conditions where the nominal increase of exports and investment achieved through export zones is offset by negative economic impacts on the host country: Low skill, modular zones of the kind described above encourage dependence on import substitution at the expense of local suppliers, disrupt local communities and change labor patterns to the disadvantage of the poor (even as they create employment), and provide inadequate urban infrastructures in the face of the massive influx of workers, often causing environmental problems in the process (Amirahmadi and Wu, 1994). To transform an economy and sustain high levels of export, zones must, mainstream economists such as Amirahmadi and Wu (1994: 832) argue, connect to regional policies and act as portals to generalize a liberal trade regime to the whole country.…”
Section: Towards a Typology Of Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bost (2010) underlined that a parallel exists between export-oriented industrialization and the use of free ports. For example, Taiwan and South Korea started export-oriented industrialization by setting their first free zones in Kaohsiung and Masan in the 1960s (Amirahmadi and Weiping, 1995). When other Asian countries such as Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and the Philippines started to consider export-oriented development, they also implemented free zones.…”
Section: Actors and The Function Of Free Portsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) outlined an increase in capital stock, creation of employment opportunities, promotion of technology transfer, growth of exports and foreign exchange earnings, and general stimulation of national economic activity as the major benefits of EPZs. Amirahmadi and Weiping (1995) in Asian survey highlights three important reasons for giving importance to EPZs in Asian countries as economic tool over other types of the zones like free trade zones, single factories and special economic zones. These reasons are :1) To attract FDIs into export industries by providing relatively liberal trade regime mostly for producing capital intensive import substitutes; 2) To create attractive investment environment to maintain their share in FDIs ( limited FDIs) and create good relations with European and American countries; 3) lower cost of EPZs because mostly in Asian countries infrastructure situation is not adequate so it is a kind of privilege or attraction given by local government to investors.…”
Section: Background and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%