2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10290-014-0207-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Export mode, firm heterogeneity, and source country characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphically, we check whether our data is consistent with the theory that exporters sell more, pay higher wages, hire more workers and perform better than nonexporters (Davies & Jeppesen, ; Lee, ; McCann, ; Melitz, ). Figures show kernel density estimates of the log of sales, employment and performance (productivity) between exporters and nonexporters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Graphically, we check whether our data is consistent with the theory that exporters sell more, pay higher wages, hire more workers and perform better than nonexporters (Davies & Jeppesen, ; Lee, ; McCann, ; Melitz, ). Figures show kernel density estimates of the log of sales, employment and performance (productivity) between exporters and nonexporters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the survey, firms are asked to indicate their share of sales coming from national or export sales (direct and indirect) . We follow Davies and Jeppesen () and McCann () and define a firm as an exporting firm if any of its share of sales comes from export (either directly or indirectly). From this definition, we deduce from the data that the number of nonexporting firms (52 461) exceeds that of exporting firms (15 182) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A key-feature of our model is that markups also differ by the type of firm (intermediary, indirect manufacturer exporter or direct manufacturer exporter) and this, in turn, leads to a differential response of these types of firms to common external shocks, 1 Among the studies that theoretically address the presence of intermediary firms in international trade, see Rauch and Watson (2004); Raff and Schmitt (2006); Raff and Schmitt (2009); Antràs and Costinot (2011);and Bai et al (2016). Empirical analyses can instead be found in Bernard et al (2010); Ahn et al (2011);Bernard et al (2015); Crozet et al (2013); Grazzi and Tomasi (2016); and Davies and Jeppesen (2015), among others. Finally, it is worth mentioning an emerging line of research delving into the phenomenon of the so-called Carry-along Trade (CAT), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%