Abstract:The McMillan map is a one-parameter family of integrable symplectic\ud
maps of the plane, for which the origin is a hyperbolic xed point\ud
with a homoclinic loop, with small Lyapunov exponent when the parameter is\ud
small. We consider a perturbation of the McMillan map for which we show\ud
that the loop breaks in two invariant curves which are exponentially close one\ud
to the other and which intersect transversely along two primary homoclinic\ud
orbits. We compute the asymptotic expansion of several quanti… Show more
“…Both parameterizations (48) and (50) satisfy that, fixing τ = τ * , they give parameterizations of the invariant curves of the fixed point of the 2π -Poincaré map from the section τ = τ * to the section τ = τ * + 2π .…”
Section: Different Parameterizations Of the Invariant Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Actually the next theorem is a classical perturbative result. (50) and such that they are the analytic continuation of the parameterizations of the invariant manifolds obtained in Theorem 4.5.…”
Section: The Global Invariant Manifolds For the General Casementioning
confidence: 96%
“…(50). Moreover, (Q u 1 , P u 1 ) ∈ A σ × A σ are defined in I u ρ 3 ,ρ 4 × T σ and there exists a constant b 4 > 0 such that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 45mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…which are solutions of the partial differential equation (50). Our strategy will be: • To obtain the parameterizations (Q u,s (v, τ ), P u,s (v, τ )) in a transition domain (Theorem 4.5).…”
Section: The Global Invariant Manifolds For the General Casementioning
We study the problem of exponentially small splitting of separatrices of one degree of freedom classical Hamiltonian systems with a non-autonomous perturbation fast and periodic in time. We provide a result valid for general systems which are algebraic or trigonometric polynomials in the state variables. It consists on obtaining a rigorous proof of the asymptotic formula for the measure of the splitting. We obtain that the splitting has the asymptotic behavior K ε β e −a/ε , identifying the constants K , β, a in terms of the system features. We consider several cases. In some cases, assuming the perturbation is small enough, the values of K , β coincide with the classical Melnikov approach. We identify the limit size of the perturbation for which this theory holds true. However for the limit cases, which appear naturally both in averaging and bifurcation theories, we encounter that, generically, K and β are not well predicted by Melnikov theory.
“…Both parameterizations (48) and (50) satisfy that, fixing τ = τ * , they give parameterizations of the invariant curves of the fixed point of the 2π -Poincaré map from the section τ = τ * to the section τ = τ * + 2π .…”
Section: Different Parameterizations Of the Invariant Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Actually the next theorem is a classical perturbative result. (50) and such that they are the analytic continuation of the parameterizations of the invariant manifolds obtained in Theorem 4.5.…”
Section: The Global Invariant Manifolds For the General Casementioning
confidence: 96%
“…(50). Moreover, (Q u 1 , P u 1 ) ∈ A σ × A σ are defined in I u ρ 3 ,ρ 4 × T σ and there exists a constant b 4 > 0 such that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 45mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…which are solutions of the partial differential equation (50). Our strategy will be: • To obtain the parameterizations (Q u,s (v, τ ), P u,s (v, τ )) in a transition domain (Theorem 4.5).…”
Section: The Global Invariant Manifolds For the General Casementioning
We study the problem of exponentially small splitting of separatrices of one degree of freedom classical Hamiltonian systems with a non-autonomous perturbation fast and periodic in time. We provide a result valid for general systems which are algebraic or trigonometric polynomials in the state variables. It consists on obtaining a rigorous proof of the asymptotic formula for the measure of the splitting. We obtain that the splitting has the asymptotic behavior K ε β e −a/ε , identifying the constants K , β, a in terms of the system features. We consider several cases. In some cases, assuming the perturbation is small enough, the values of K , β coincide with the classical Melnikov approach. We identify the limit size of the perturbation for which this theory holds true. However for the limit cases, which appear naturally both in averaging and bifurcation theories, we encounter that, generically, K and β are not well predicted by Melnikov theory.
“…The three separatrices (thick lines), some level curves (thin lines), and the four equilibrium points (small circles) of the the limit Hamiltonian(25) associated to the third order resonance. Therefore,f 3 = φ O( 2 ), and the integrable dynamics of the HamiltonianH 1 approximates the dynamics of the mapf 3 when µ 3.…”
We model the phase oscillations of electrons in race-track microtrons by means of an area preserving map with a fixed point at the origin, which represents the synchronous trajectory of a reference particle in the beam. We study the nonlinear stability of the origin in terms of the synchronous phase —the phase of the synchronous particle at the injection. We estimate the size and shape of the stability domain around the origin, whose main connected component is enclosed by an invariant curve. We describe the evolution of the stability domain as the synchronous phase varies. We also clarify the role of the stable and unstable invariant curves of some hyperbolic (fixed or periodic) points.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.