1984
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1256046160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponentially bounded positive definite functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atzmon [1] characterized the moment matrices associated with measures in the closed unit disk D = {z ∈ C: |z| 1} in terms of a property for a bi-sequence {c i, j } ∞ i, j=0 to be positive definite. The complex moment problem when a representing measure with compact support exists is completely characterized in [17] and in a general theorem of Berg and Maserick [4]. See also the treatment in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atzmon [1] characterized the moment matrices associated with measures in the closed unit disk D = {z ∈ C: |z| 1} in terms of a property for a bi-sequence {c i, j } ∞ i, j=0 to be positive definite. The complex moment problem when a representing measure with compact support exists is completely characterized in [17] and in a general theorem of Berg and Maserick [4]. See also the treatment in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information concerning the characterization of HPD matrices which are moment matrices with respect to a certain measure μ with support on C see among others [2,7,18]. Since moment matrices associated with measures with infinite support on C are HPD matrices, many of the examples that appear in this paper are indeed moment matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results have been revisited in [15] with a different approach, and were recently generalized in [7] to weighted p -norms, p 1. In [8] it is shown that the general result in [5] carries to the even smaller cone of sums of 2d-powers, R[X] 2d ⊆ R[X] 2 , where d 1 is an integer. In particular, R[X] 2d · 1 = Psd([−1, 1] n ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%