2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1311.1450
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential-type Inequalities Involving Ratios of the Modified Bessel Function of the First Kind and their Applications

Abstract: The modified Bessel function of the first kind, I ν (x), arises in numerous areas of study, such as physics, signal processing, probability, statistics, etc. As such, there has been much interest in recent years in deducing properties of functionals involving I ν (x), in particular, of the ratio I ν+1 (x)/I ν (x), when ν, x ≥ 0. In this paper we establish sharp upper and lower bounds on H(ν, x) = ∞ k=1 I ν+k (x)/I ν (x) for ν, x ≥ 0 that appears as the complementary cumulative hazard function for a Skellam(λ, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that we need a sharp integrable upper bound of e −t I ν (t). To the best of our knowledge, the best upper bound of e −t I ν (t) is given in [3] and is not sharp enough.…”
Section: Asymptotic Behaviour Of Spectral Determinant On Degenerating...mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that we need a sharp integrable upper bound of e −t I ν (t). To the best of our knowledge, the best upper bound of e −t I ν (t) is given in [3] and is not sharp enough.…”
Section: Asymptotic Behaviour Of Spectral Determinant On Degenerating...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They again improved this in [2] by finding an efficient way of solving the recurrence relation of a n . and C 1, 3 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the series in (A.5) satisfies the monotonicity condition in its terms when t is larger than log (4) 3π 2 = 0.04682033.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma A2mentioning
confidence: 95%