“…Finally, the Method QT10 is more efficient than the hybrid sixth algebraic order method developed by Chawla and Rao with minimal phase-lag [44], which is indicated as Method MCR6 for large CPU time and less efficient than the Method MCR6 for small CPU time. 3.The twelfth algebraic order multistep method developed by Quinlan and Tremaine [41], which is indicated as Method QT12 is more efficient than the tenth order multistep method developed by Quinlan and Tremaine [41], which is indicated as Method QT10 4.The Phase-Fitted Method (Case 1) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF1 is more efficient than the classical form of the fourth algebraic order four-step method developed in Section 3, which is indicated as Method NMCL, the exponentially-fitted method of Raptis and Allison [42] and the Phase-Fitted Method (Case 2) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF2 5.The New Obtained Method developed in Section 3 (Case 2), which is indicated as Method NMC2 is more efficient than the classical form of the fourth algebraic order four-step method developed in Section 3, which is indicated as Method NMCL, the exponentially-fitted method of Raptis and Allison [42] and the Phase-Fitted Method (Case 2) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF2 and the Phase-Fitted Method (Case 1) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF1 6.The New Obtained Method developed in Section 3 (Case 2), which is indicated as Method NMC1 is the most efficient one.…”