1978
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(78)90047-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential-fitting methods for the numerical solution of the schrodinger equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the above mentioned methods are more efficient than the exponentially-fitted method of Raptis and Allison [42], which is indicated as Method RA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both the above mentioned methods are more efficient than the exponentially-fitted method of Raptis and Allison [42], which is indicated as Method RA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the Method QT10 is more efficient than the hybrid sixth algebraic order method developed by Chawla and Rao with minimal phase-lag [44], which is indicated as Method MCR6 for large CPU time and less efficient than the Method MCR6 for small CPU time. 3.The twelfth algebraic order multistep method developed by Quinlan and Tremaine [41], which is indicated as Method QT12 is more efficient than the tenth order multistep method developed by Quinlan and Tremaine [41], which is indicated as Method QT10 4.The Phase-Fitted Method (Case 1) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF1 is more efficient than the classical form of the fourth algebraic order four-step method developed in Section 3, which is indicated as Method NMCL, the exponentially-fitted method of Raptis and Allison [42] and the Phase-Fitted Method (Case 2) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF2 5.The New Obtained Method developed in Section 3 (Case 2), which is indicated as Method NMC2 is more efficient than the classical form of the fourth algebraic order four-step method developed in Section 3, which is indicated as Method NMCL, the exponentially-fitted method of Raptis and Allison [42] and the Phase-Fitted Method (Case 2) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF2 and the Phase-Fitted Method (Case 1) developed in [1], which is indicated as Method NMPF1 6.The New Obtained Method developed in Section 3 (Case 2), which is indicated as Method NMC1 is the most efficient one.…”
Section: The Tenth Algebraic Order Multistep Methods Developedmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We mention here that in the literature the last decades there are several variable step procedures for the approximation of the solution for systems of Schrödinger type equations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Error Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The Exponentially-fitted four-step method developed by Raptis [35] which is indicated as Method I.…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%