2019
DOI: 10.1112/blms.12294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential factorizations of holomorphic maps

Abstract: We show that any element of the special linear group prefixSL2false(prefixRfalse) is a product of two exponentials if the ring prefixR is either the ring of holomorphic functions on an open Riemann surface or the disc algebra. This is sharp: one exponential factor is not enough since the exponential map corresponding to prefixSL2false(double-struckCfalse) is not surjective. Our result extends to the linear group prefixGL2false(prefixRfalse), where it is sharp as well.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, it was shown in [KS,Thm.2] that e 2 (A ) = 2 if A is the disk algebra, and it was recently proved in [L,Thm. 1] (answering a question posed in [KS]) that the same is valid for algebras of holomorphic functions on closed bordered Riemann surfaces.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it was shown in [KS,Thm.2] that e 2 (A ) = 2 if A is the disk algebra, and it was recently proved in [L,Thm. 1] (answering a question posed in [KS]) that the same is valid for algebras of holomorphic functions on closed bordered Riemann surfaces.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M(2,C) be the algebra of all complex 2×2 matrices, and GL(2,C) the group of its invertible elements. Then, in the same way as in [11, Corollary 1], the following corollary can be deduced from Theorem 1.1. Corollary Let A:X¯GLfalse(2,double-struckCfalse) be continuous on X¯, holomorphic in X, and null‐homotopic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The problem is that X need not be simply connected. Our proof of Theorem 1.1 is nevertheless some adaption of that proof in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Let D be the closed unit disk in C. For X = D, Theorem 1.1 was recently proved by Kutzschebauch and Studer [8,Theorem 2]. In [8] also the question is asked if Theorem 1.1 is true in general, and it is noted that there is some problem to adapt in a straightforward way the proof of [8] to the general case. The problem is that X need not be simply connected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%