2009
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2009.32.2.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explosive loading of multi storey RC buildings: Dynamic response and progressive collapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Weerheijm et al . ). This will avoid abrupt failure of structures without ample warning (Wu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Weerheijm et al . ). This will avoid abrupt failure of structures without ample warning (Wu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They recommended that more variables (such as slab reinforcement ratio and slab thickness/span ratio), need to be further investigated, and that analytical studies to capture the tensile membrane action developed in the slabs for progressive collapse should be conducted. Few other contributions, in which finite element formulations are explicitly used, tackle the dynamic analysis of progressive collapse of RC structures (Shi et al, 2010;Weerheijm et al, 2009;Sasani and Sagiroglu, 2010;Sasani et al, 2011). Yu and Tan (2013) carried out an experimental investigation on the resistance of RC beam to progressive collapse due to a middle column removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer contributions tackle the dynamic analysis of progressive collapse of reinforced concrete structures, among which [10, 15-17, 19, 24]. Recent works as [15][16][17] use an explicit finite element code, which is adopted in the simulation of blast-induced progressive collapse analyses, where the blast can be modelled in a sophisticated way (as a pressure wave propagation in the air) or in a more simplified manner (as a pressure-time distribution on the concerned elements). This computational technique is mainly suitable for modelling the high dynamic response of concrete and steel during the loading stage, due to the small time steps required by the explicit schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an abrupt member removal results in an impulsive loading scenario. This event-independent approach is widely used in the context of progressive collapse simulation techniques [2-12, 14, 18-22, 26, 27], with the aim of studying the structural resistance to the sudden loss of a primary load-bearing element, in contrast to the event-dependent approaches [15][16][17] where the collapse triggering event is modelled to analyse the structural response to a specific loading scenario. According to [26], the sudden column loss approach constitutes a useful design scenario for the assessment of structural robustness, since it offers an upper bound on the deformations obtained with respect to an event-dependent simulation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%