2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16751.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explosive common-envelope ejection: implications for gamma-ray bursts and low-mass black-hole binaries

Abstract: We present a new mechanism for the ejection of a common envelope in a massive binary, where the energy source is nuclear energy rather than orbital energy. This can occur during the slow merger of a massive primary with a secondary of 1–3  M⊙ when the primary has already completed helium core burning. We show that in the final merging phase, hydrogen‐rich material from the secondary can be injected into the helium‐burning shell of the primary. This leads to a nuclear runaway and the explosive ejection of both … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
109
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the density profile of the donor envelope is parametrized by λ = 1/2, the efficiency with which orbital energy is used on unbinding the common envelope by α CE = 4 (justified by explosive shell burning in massive stars during the common-envelope phase, Podsiadlowski et al 2010) and the specific angular momentum of the envelope after it has left the system, relative to the specific angular momentum of the pre-common-envelope binary, by γ = 7/4. In choosing a value of α CE λ = 2 for massive stars we follow Portegies Zwart & Yungelson (1998); Yungelson et al (2006); Yungelson & Lasota (2008).…”
Section: Population Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the density profile of the donor envelope is parametrized by λ = 1/2, the efficiency with which orbital energy is used on unbinding the common envelope by α CE = 4 (justified by explosive shell burning in massive stars during the common-envelope phase, Podsiadlowski et al 2010) and the specific angular momentum of the envelope after it has left the system, relative to the specific angular momentum of the pre-common-envelope binary, by γ = 7/4. In choosing a value of α CE λ = 2 for massive stars we follow Portegies Zwart & Yungelson (1998); Yungelson et al (2006); Yungelson & Lasota (2008).…”
Section: Population Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ivanova (2002) argued that nuclear fusion should be added into the energy sources that may contribute to the envelope ejection. Podsiadlowski et al (2010) proposed that a thermonuclear runaway which is caused by the mixing hydrogen from the secondary into the helium-burning shell of the primary would assist the ejection. When treating the binding energy of the envelope, Ivanova & Chaichenets (2011) pointed out that there might be mass outflows during the slow spiral-in stage, when the orbital energy is balanced with the enthalpy rather than merely the internal energy of the envelope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close massive binary systems that experience mass trans- fer, common-envelope evolution, or a merger (Podsiadlowski et al 2010;Langer 2012) are possible progenitors of LGRBs, because they can likely produce the required rapidly rotating massive stars without H or He envelopes. Recent observations of Galactic O-type stars show that, in fact, 70% of massive stars experience mass transfer with a companion and ∼ 30% undergo a merger (Sana et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%