Exploring why quality circles work in primary health care: a realist review protocol

Abstract

BackgroundQuality circles (QCs) are commonly used in primary health care in Europe to consider and improve standard practice over time. They represent a complex social intervention that occurs within the fast-changing system of primary health care. Numerous controlled trials, reviews, and studies have shown small but unpredictable positive effect sizes on behavior change. Although QCs seem to be effective, stakeholders have difficulty understanding how the results are achieved and in generalizing the results with confidence. They also lack understanding of the active components of QCs which result in changes in the behavior of health care professionals. This protocol for a realist synthesis will examine how configurations of components and the contextual features of QCs influence their performance.Methods/DesignStakeholder interviews and a scoping search revealed the processes of QCs and helped to describe their core components and underlying theories. After clarifying their historical and geographical distribution, a purposive and systematic search was developed to identify relevant papers to answer the research questions, which are: understanding why, how, and when QCs work, over what time frame, and in what circumstances. After selecting and abstracting appropriate data, configurations of contexts and mechanisms which influence the outcome of QCs within each study will be identified. Studies will be grouped by similar propositional statements in order to identify patterns and validation from stakeholders sought. Finally, theories will be explored in order to explain these patterns and to help stakeholders maintain and improve QC performance.DiscussionAnalyzing context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) patterns will reveal how QCs work and how contextual factors interact to influence their outcome. The aim is to investigate unique configurations that enable them to improve the performance of health care professionals. Using a standardized reporting system, this realist review will allow the research questions to be answered to the satisfaction of key stakeholders and enable on-going critical examination and dissemination of the findings.Study registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42013004826.

Quality circles for quality improvement in primary health care: their effectiveness, gaps of knowledge, origins and significance – a scoping review

“…These are theory driven approaches that allow questions to be answered about what works; for whom, how, and why – or not, and in what contexts (148, 149). We have built on the findings of this scoping review and are undertaking a realist review to address these knowledge gaps and research needs (150).…”

Research protocol: a realist synthesis of contestability in community-based mental health markets

“…Where outcomes are different in certain contexts we will seek to explain how and why these outcomes occur differently [ 20 , 35 ]. Each study will contribute to clarifying or reformulating C-M-O configurations [ 26 , 38 ]. Papers may be grouped by similar propositional statements in order to further identify patterns and identify similar contexts and mechanisms.…”

Exploring how and why Care Groups work to improve infant feeding practices in Low and Middle Income Countries: a realist review protocol

“…The Care Group approach contains many of the properties of complex interventions: "Complex interventions depend on human behaviour and their active ingredients tend to enable people to do the right thing at the right time or constrain them from doing something" [14]. However, exactly how the Care Group approach of 'social and behaviour change promotion' achieves its results is not entirely obvious.…”