2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring wellbeing and agency among urban youth through photovoice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many codes and participants' understanding of the constructs overlapped; for example, students identified personal and community wellbeing as helping them cope. We report our findings on wellbeing and agency elsewhere (Rose et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many codes and participants' understanding of the constructs overlapped; for example, students identified personal and community wellbeing as helping them cope. We report our findings on wellbeing and agency elsewhere (Rose et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their concerns may reach policy-makers through public forums and the display of their photographs. By using a camera to record their concerns and needs, it permits individuals who rarely have contact with those who make decisions over their lives, to make their voices heard (Wang 1999;Wang andBurris 1994, 1997;Wang et al 2004;Lopez et al 2005a, b;Castleden et al 2008;Rhodes et al 2008;Hergenrather et al 2009;Teti et al 2012;Sanon et al 2014;Switzer et al 2015;Maratos et al 2016;Rose et al 2016).…”
Section: Arts-based and Visual Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it may be argued that the sharing of these photographs (often with captions) is another way of involving participants in data analysis, given that they have some control over what gets shared. This was the case in a number HANNA 28 beijing international review of education 2 (2020) 11-34 of the studies, where a school-or community-based exhibition was set up (e.g., DeJaynes & Curmi-Hall, 2019;Rogers, 2017;Rose et al, 2016;Call-Cummings & Martinez, 2016;Kaplan et al, 2007;Mitchell et al, 2006). Nevertheless, it remains the case that the audience has the freedom to interpret the images on display in their own way, which may be entirely different from the intentions of the learner-photographers, and therefore may not promote the kind of 'counter storytelling' that scholars such as Goessling (2018) or Allen (2009) might wish for.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%