2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Various Linguistic Features for Stance Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Opinions are not always explicitly expressed, and can also be implicit, explicit, ironic, metaphoric, uncertain, etc. Sun et al (2016), Al-Ayyoub et al (2018), and Simaki et al (2018, which make stance detection more challenging. Moreover, surrounding words and symbols can alter the stance of an utterance (Sun et al, 2016), e.g.…”
Section: Stance Utterancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Opinions are not always explicitly expressed, and can also be implicit, explicit, ironic, metaphoric, uncertain, etc. Sun et al (2016), Al-Ayyoub et al (2018), and Simaki et al (2018, which make stance detection more challenging. Moreover, surrounding words and symbols can alter the stance of an utterance (Sun et al, 2016), e.g.…”
Section: Stance Utterancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al (2016), Al-Ayyoub et al (2018), and Simaki et al (2018, which make stance detection more challenging. Moreover, surrounding words and symbols can alter the stance of an utterance (Sun et al, 2016), e.g. negating words or ironic emojis inverting the meaning of a text, which are especially challenging to detect.…”
Section: Stance Utterancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the tweet ''Jeb bush is the only sane candidate in this republican lineup, I support him'' will be assigned positive by sentiment analysis [140], [143], but extracted with 'against' stance to the topic ''Donald Trump as President'' by stance detection. Research on stance detection can be categorized into four groups based on debate settings, such as congressional floor debates [6]- [9], company-internal discussions [10], [11], online forums ideological debates [12]- [27] and hot-event oriented debates on social media [28]- [50]. The latter two are open domain and flexible, therefore more challengeable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of my knowledge, beside my own research, Sun et al [2016] are the only authors that have published some work, in which syntactic features are explored for SD. In their approach, as participants in the NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 Task 4, Xu et al [2016] exploit both morphological features, connecting each word to its PoS tag and syntactic features, exploiting dependency trees, connecting two words that are in a dependency relation between themselves and also exploiting the "paths" that connect the root of a sentence to each "leaf" of the syntactic tree.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approaches For Stance Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As anticipated in Section 3.2, as I was able to verify, beside my own research there are very few works of NLP that have explored the contribution of syntax as feature for SD. The only authors that have published some work on this regard are Sun et al [2016], who, as participants in the NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 shared task on SD in Chinese, exploit both morphological and syntactic features, connecting words that are in a dependency relation between each other. Their research was conducted solely on data in Chinese, extracted from Sina Weibo and Twitter.…”
Section: Stance Detection Using Dependency Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%