2018
DOI: 10.1080/07380577.2018.1522682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Validity, Reliability, and Factor Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology in an Italian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A research group of Sapienza University of Rome and Rehabilitation & Outcome Measures Assessment (ROMA) association conducted the study. The research group dealt with the validation of different outcome measures in Italy 20,21,22,23 . The institutional review board of Sapienza Università di Roma approved the study and guaranteed ethical standards and procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research group of Sapienza University of Rome and Rehabilitation & Outcome Measures Assessment (ROMA) association conducted the study. The research group dealt with the validation of different outcome measures in Italy 20,21,22,23 . The institutional review board of Sapienza Università di Roma approved the study and guaranteed ethical standards and procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The institutes composed the Institutional Review Board and have guaranteed ethical standard and procedures. In the last years, the research group has dealt different validation studies in Italy (48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research group has carried out many outcome measures in Italy. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The purpose of this study was to translate the MROC Scale into Italian and adapt it culturally and validate it. Translation and cultural adaptation have been carried out applying internationally recognized methods, and experts have also ensured that the original meaning of the scale is maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%