Abstract:Background
Early sexual debut, low educational attainment, history of rape and transactional and intergenerational sex have been associated with HIV infection among Nigerian adolescents, especially females. We sought to understand the “why”, and how to mitigate against these determinants and barriers to addressing adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and HIV prevention needs.
Methods
This qualitative study generated data from 49 focus gr… Show more
“…The ubiquitous application of the Act represents a stark exemplar of the cultural and political institutionalisation of such exclusion, which perpetuates barriers to sexual minority individuals accessing social, health and other relational and asset-based support in their communities 59. In addition, limitations in access to healthcare services due to parental consent requirements further complicate issues for sexual minority adolescents 56 60–62…”
BackgroundWe aimed to determine associations between the mental health status of adolescents by self-reported sexual identity; and to determine associations between the mental health status of sexual minority adolescents living with and without HIV.MethodsThis cross-sectional study collected data from Nigerians aged 13–19 years old using an online survey. We collected information on dependent (sexual identity) and independent (presence of depressive symptoms, generalised anxiety disorder, suicidal attempt/ideation, HIV status) study variables. A multivariate regression model determined associations between the dependent and independent variables. A second multivariate regression model was developed to establish associations between HIV status among sexual minority individuals and the dependent variables. All models were adjusted for age, sex assigned at birth and education level.ResultsAmong 1247 respondents living in Nigeria, 497 (39.9%) identified as sexual minority individuals. Compared with their heterosexual peers, sexual minority adolescents had significantly higher odds of reporting depressive symptoms (adjusted OR (AOR): 5.54; 95% CI: 4.10 to 7.47; p<0.001), high general anxiety (AOR: 3.56; 95% CI: 2.64 to 4.79; p<0.001) and history of suicidal attempt/ideation (AOR: 2.95; 95% CI: 2.20 to 3.94; p<0.001). Sexual minority adolescents living with HIV had significantly higher odds of high general anxiety (AOR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.21 to 4.84; p=0.013), while those with unknown HIV status had significantly higher odds of depressive symptoms (AOR: 3.82, 95% CI: 2.78 to 5.27; p<0.001), high general anxiety (AOR: 3.09; 95% CI: 2.29 to 4.17; p<0.001) and suicidal attempt/ideation (AOR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.22 to 2.24; p=0.001).ConclusionSexual minority adolescents reported poorer mental health status than heterosexual adolescents. Although there was no significant difference in the mental health status of sexual minority adolescents living and not living with HIV, sexual minority adolescents with unknown HIV status reported worse mental health than their HIV-negative peers. Sexual minority adolescents in Nigeria need comprehensive rights-based care that improves access to mental health services, and those with unknown HIV status may need both HIV and mental health screening and care.
“…The ubiquitous application of the Act represents a stark exemplar of the cultural and political institutionalisation of such exclusion, which perpetuates barriers to sexual minority individuals accessing social, health and other relational and asset-based support in their communities 59. In addition, limitations in access to healthcare services due to parental consent requirements further complicate issues for sexual minority adolescents 56 60–62…”
BackgroundWe aimed to determine associations between the mental health status of adolescents by self-reported sexual identity; and to determine associations between the mental health status of sexual minority adolescents living with and without HIV.MethodsThis cross-sectional study collected data from Nigerians aged 13–19 years old using an online survey. We collected information on dependent (sexual identity) and independent (presence of depressive symptoms, generalised anxiety disorder, suicidal attempt/ideation, HIV status) study variables. A multivariate regression model determined associations between the dependent and independent variables. A second multivariate regression model was developed to establish associations between HIV status among sexual minority individuals and the dependent variables. All models were adjusted for age, sex assigned at birth and education level.ResultsAmong 1247 respondents living in Nigeria, 497 (39.9%) identified as sexual minority individuals. Compared with their heterosexual peers, sexual minority adolescents had significantly higher odds of reporting depressive symptoms (adjusted OR (AOR): 5.54; 95% CI: 4.10 to 7.47; p<0.001), high general anxiety (AOR: 3.56; 95% CI: 2.64 to 4.79; p<0.001) and history of suicidal attempt/ideation (AOR: 2.95; 95% CI: 2.20 to 3.94; p<0.001). Sexual minority adolescents living with HIV had significantly higher odds of high general anxiety (AOR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.21 to 4.84; p=0.013), while those with unknown HIV status had significantly higher odds of depressive symptoms (AOR: 3.82, 95% CI: 2.78 to 5.27; p<0.001), high general anxiety (AOR: 3.09; 95% CI: 2.29 to 4.17; p<0.001) and suicidal attempt/ideation (AOR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.22 to 2.24; p=0.001).ConclusionSexual minority adolescents reported poorer mental health status than heterosexual adolescents. Although there was no significant difference in the mental health status of sexual minority adolescents living and not living with HIV, sexual minority adolescents with unknown HIV status reported worse mental health than their HIV-negative peers. Sexual minority adolescents in Nigeria need comprehensive rights-based care that improves access to mental health services, and those with unknown HIV status may need both HIV and mental health screening and care.
“…The primary outcome variable of this study was “ever tested for HIV?” and was dichotomized as “0” for “no” or “1” for “yes.” The explanatory variables were selected based on the literature and their relevance [18–20] and were divided into three categories: (1) Sociodemographic factors include age, marital status, educational level, employment status, wealth index, region, and place of residence. Also, household factors measured included exposure to mass media (listening to the radio and watching television), access to the internet, and mobile phone ownership.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young people comprise a heterogeneous group whose sexual behaviors and susceptibility to HIV infection differ widely by social context, including increased individual autonomy and a lack of social control [8,9]. There is growing evidence that high-risk behaviors such as early sexual debut, substance use (alcohol consumption and drug use), inconsistent condom use, and multiple and concurrent sexual relationships, as well as poor HIV knowledge, low-risk perception, and sensation-seeking behaviors, increase HIV risks and transmissions among young people [10][11][12][13][14]. In addition, biological factors such as low rates of male circumcision [15,16] and manifestations of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis) [11,14,17] contribute to some of the increased HIV risk and burden among this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing evidence that high-risk behaviors such as early sexual debut, substance use (alcohol consumption and drug use), inconsistent condom use, and multiple and concurrent sexual relationships, as well as poor HIV knowledge, low-risk perception, and sensation-seeking behaviors, increase HIV risks and transmissions among young people [10][11][12][13][14]. In addition, biological factors such as low rates of male circumcision [15,16] and manifestations of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis) [11,14,17] contribute to some of the increased HIV risk and burden among this population. They continue to be an important target group for HIV prevention and STI surveillance due to their unique behavioral and social-related vulnerability.…”
HIV testing is a crucial strategy for HIV prevention, treatment, care, and support. However, its uptake is suboptimal among young people, particularly in settings where the HIV burden is highest. In Papua New Guinea (PNG), HIV testing and its predictors among young men are understudied. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of not testing for HIV among young men aged 15-24 years in PNG. Data were drawn from the 2016-2018 PNG Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). A total of 1,362 young men were included in the study. Multivariable logistic regression using the complex sampling technique was used to determine predictors of not testing for HIV. Results were reported as adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). The prevalence of not testing for HIV among young men was 82.7%. Young men who were never married (AOR 1.88; 95% CI: 1.19-2.96), did not own a mobile phone (AOR 1.79; 95% CI: 1.17-2.77), had not paid anyone for sex (AOR 2.82; 95% CI: 1.29-6.14), and had no STIs (AOR 1.97; 95% CI: 1.00-3.85) had higher odds of not testing for HIV. The odds of not testing for HIV remained lower among young men who did not always use a condom during sex (AOR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.96). HIV testing among young men in this study was much lower, suggesting an urgent need to adopt novel prevention approaches to address this shortfall. Furthermore, youth-oriented health services should be prioritized with a focus on improving HIV knowledge, risk reduction, and behaviour change among young men in this setting.
“…Three areas in which gender equality can foster progress is in science, education, and health [ 2 ]. Medical and dental researchers stand at the fulcrum of social development through their engagement in these three domains [ 3 ]. They also contribute to economic development through their work on understanding disease and promotion of medicine, vaccines, diagnostics, and effective public health messages.…”
Objective
The aim of the study was to gain a qualitative insight into scientific researchers’ perceptions of gender inequality inside Nigerian research institutions through an investigation of how gender equality is enacted in medical and dental research institutions in Nigeria.
Methods
This descriptive and cross-sectional qualitative study probed decision-making around navigating gender inequity and explored opinions about how a supportive environment for female medical and dental researchers could be established. Data were collected through semi-structured telephone interviews with 54 scientific researchers across 17 medical and dental academic institutions in Nigeria between March and July 2022. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
Three core themes emerged: institutionalized male dominance in research institutions; changing narratives on gender equalities in research and academic enterprise; and women driving the conscience for change in research institutions. Female medical and dental researchers’ perceived gender equality was challenging mainstream androcentric values in knowledge production within the medical and dental field; and queries the entrenchment of patriarchal values that promote a low number of female medical and dental trainees, fewer female research outputs, and few women in senior/managerial positions in the medical fields.
Conclusion
Despite the general view that change is occurring, a great deal remains to be done to facilitate the creation of a supportive environment for female medical and dental researchers in Nigeria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.