Exploring the vagueness of Religion & Spirituality in complex pediatric decision-making: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundMedical advances have led to new challenges in decision-making for parents of seriously ill children. Many parents say religion and spirituality (R&S) influence their decisions, but the mechanism and outcomes of this influence are unknown. Health care providers (HCPs) often feel unprepared to discuss R&S with parents or address conflicts between R&S beliefs and clinical recommendations. Our study sought to illuminate the influence of R&S on parental decision-making and explore how HCPs interact with parents for whom R&S are important.MethodsA longitudinal, qualitative, descriptive design was used to (1) identify R&S factors affecting parental decision-making, (2) observe changes in R&S themes over time, and (3) learn about HCP perspectives on parental R&S. The study sample included 16 cases featuring children with complex life-threatening conditions. The length of study for each case varied, ranging in duration from 8 to 531 days (median = 380, mean = 324, SD = 174). Data from each case included medical records and sets of interviews conducted at least monthly with mothers (n = 16), fathers (n = 12), and HCPs (n = 108). Thematic analysis was performed on 363 narrative interviews to identify R&S themes and content related to decision-making.ResultsParents from 13 cases reported R&S directly influenced decision-making. Most HCPs were unaware of this influence. Fifteen R&S themes appeared in parent and HCP transcripts. Themes most often associated with decision-making were Hope & Faith, God is in Control, Miracles, and Prayer. Despite instability in the child’s condition, these themes remained consistently relevant across the trajectory of illness. R&S influenced decisions about treatment initiation, procedures, and life-sustaining therapy, but the variance in effect of R&S on parents’ choices ultimately depended upon other medical & non-medical factors.ConclusionsParents consider R&S fundamental to decision-making, but apply R&S concepts in vague ways, suggesting R&S impact how decisions are made more than what decisions are made. Lack of clarity in parental expressions of R&S does not necessarily indicate insincerity or underestimation of the seriousness of the child’s prognosis; R&S can be applied to decision-making in both functional and dysfunctional ways. We present three models of how religious and spiritual vagueness functions in parental decision-making and suggest clinical applications.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0360-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Parental experience of hope in pediatric palliative care: Critical reflections on an exemplar of parents of a child with trisomy 18

“…Studies on the spiritual aspect of hope at the end of life note such concepts as, according to Roscigno et al (), leaving events in ‘God's hands' (p. 1,239), or, in Moro et al, the ideas of ‘letting God handle it' (p. 56), and in Nafratilova, Allenidekania, and Wanda () ‘surrendering to God' and ‘still hoping for a miracle' (p. 128). Superdock, Barfield, Brandon, and Docherty () reveal that the end‐of‐life experience does not result in any loss of the parents' faith in God. In the blog posts, we can note the belief of Aaron's family in a life after death (Aaron's ‘Heavenly Home').…”

Spiritual assessment and spiritual care offerings as a standard of care in pediatric oncology: A recommendation informed by a systematic review of the literature

“…Children with cancer and their families benefit from interdisciplinary health care that includes spiritual or existential care domains . Spiritual care involves the exploration of illness, suffering, anticipatory grief, chronic and terminal conditions, and losses as well as the search for justice, purpose, hope, resiliency, relationships, meaning, and life legacy .…”

Forgoing life sustaining treatment decision-making in critically ill children: Parental views and factor’s influence

“…8 All participants, both Moslem and Catholics, while believing that withholding or withdrawing LST is not prohibited by their religions, they still believed in the existence of miracles, had a fear of committing a sin, and prayed and surrendered to all God's will; this study's findings are in line with the previous study by Superdock. 13 Child's best interest theme included prognosis, suffering and quality of life as factors that are considered by parents in making decisions after seeing that the maximum treatment didn't give any improvement nor removed the pain. In our study participants asked to continue mechanical ventilation even though they knew their child would have poor quality of life.…”