2016
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Utility of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale

Abstract: Abstract. State boredom – the experience of boredom in the moment – is related to a number of psychosocial issues. Until the recent creation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS), research was constrained by the lack of a comprehensive, validated measure. However, the MSBS could benefit from further evaluation. To more thoroughly validate the MSBS. In two studies, participants were induced into a state of either boredom or non-boredom, and then completed the MSBS. Discriminant analysis showed that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although participants experienced this pervasive boredom, these long periods of silence and having "nothing to do" were punctuated by infrequent and random periods of highly stimulating and stress-inducing events, including aggression, visits by police to the shelter and on the street, and the unusual behaviours of others within their environments. Still, they identified that boredom was pervasive in their lives, and the fact that their scores were the same or above those in the study by Hunter et al (2015) is especially significant. These ratings suggest that the stimulation afforded by their environments was typically so low that they experienced boredom to the same degree or more than participants who were exposed to a circumstance designed by a research team to induce boredom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although participants experienced this pervasive boredom, these long periods of silence and having "nothing to do" were punctuated by infrequent and random periods of highly stimulating and stress-inducing events, including aggression, visits by police to the shelter and on the street, and the unusual behaviours of others within their environments. Still, they identified that boredom was pervasive in their lives, and the fact that their scores were the same or above those in the study by Hunter et al (2015) is especially significant. These ratings suggest that the stimulation afforded by their environments was typically so low that they experienced boredom to the same degree or more than participants who were exposed to a circumstance designed by a research team to induce boredom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Boredom and meaningful activity engagement. We compared participant scores on the MSBS to a sample mean generated from an experimental study of boredom, where participants were exposed to a boredom condition using the same measure (Hunter et al, 2015). Only one participant (7.7%) did not endorse experiencing state boredom, with the rest reporting as bored (61.5%) or highly bored (30.8%).…”
Section: Quantitative Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing engagement in activities necessary to maintain survival has been reported in other studies that focus on the activities of homeless persons both during (Marshall et al, 2017) and following homelessness (Heuchemer & Josephsson, 2006;Marshall et al, 2018). Although he reported that boredom didn't factor into his experiences, BP's score on the MSBS was over one standard deviation above the mean when compared with those exposed to a boredom condition in an experimental study, and four standard deviations above the mean when compared with those in a non-boredom condition in the same study (Hunter et al, 2016). Alexander described an intense form of boredom while living in a shelter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…BP reported a much lower level of boredom (MSBS) at followup (baseline ¼ 158; follow-up ¼ 114), whereas Alexander reported a marginally higher degree of boredom (baseline ¼ 140; follow-up ¼ 143). When compared with a sample of participants in an experimental study of boredom using the MSBS, both BP and Alexander's scores at baseline and follow-up fell within one standard deviation of the mean for participants who were exposed to a 'boredom' condition, and more than four standard deviations above the scores of those in a control condition (Hunter et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Time perception and sense of control were also manipulated to DOI: 10.1159/000511312 maximize feelings of boredom: participants assigned to watch boring videos were made to feel they had no choice over video content and were told that the video would end after 20 min, although it continued for 25. Hunter et al [53] used a similar induction. In both of these studies [17,53], state boredom scores on the MSBS were sensitive to boredom manipulation.…”
Section: Measuring Boredommentioning
confidence: 99%