2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the use of telephone helpline pertaining to older adult suicide prevention: A Hong Kong experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcomes were assessed via sociodemographic data from the service's computerized system, as well as suicide mortality status from the Coroner's Court matched against crisis line users using the unique Hong Kong Identity Card. In this study, helpline users accounted for 14.4% of known suicides in Hong Kong during the 4 year follow-up period, and the suicide rate among helpline users was far higher than the general Hong Kong older adult population (Males: 86.3 vs. 32.6 per 100,000; Females: 42.8 vs. 16.7 per 100,000; both Incident Rate Ratio [IRR] = 2.6) (38). The majority (60%) of the helpline suicides occurred within 5 years of the service.…”
Section: Distal Evidence Of Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Outcomes were assessed via sociodemographic data from the service's computerized system, as well as suicide mortality status from the Coroner's Court matched against crisis line users using the unique Hong Kong Identity Card. In this study, helpline users accounted for 14.4% of known suicides in Hong Kong during the 4 year follow-up period, and the suicide rate among helpline users was far higher than the general Hong Kong older adult population (Males: 86.3 vs. 32.6 per 100,000; Females: 42.8 vs. 16.7 per 100,000; both Incident Rate Ratio [IRR] = 2.6) (38). The majority (60%) of the helpline suicides occurred within 5 years of the service.…”
Section: Distal Evidence Of Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Only two studies were RCTs [Gould et al (29) moderate risk of bias and Mishara et al (15) high risk of bias; Oxford quality ratings of 1]. Additionally, there were four cohort studies (11,14,31,38), and the remaining studies were a mix of observational and quasi-experimental design, most of which were cross-sectional or single group before-after designs (high risk of bias; Oxford quality ratings of 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations