2009
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2008.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the use of DEA for formative evaluation in primary diabetes care: An application to compare English practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the reason why we agree that the establishment of learning networks between the different delegations can bring interesting insights. As reported in other formative evaluation studies undertaken with DEA (see for example, [40] and [48]), the application of this method in practice raises a number of questions whose resolution requires careful consideration, with the close involvement of the practitioners.…”
Section: What Can Be Learnt From This Implementation In Practice?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is the reason why we agree that the establishment of learning networks between the different delegations can bring interesting insights. As reported in other formative evaluation studies undertaken with DEA (see for example, [40] and [48]), the application of this method in practice raises a number of questions whose resolution requires careful consideration, with the close involvement of the practitioners.…”
Section: What Can Be Learnt From This Implementation In Practice?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some examples of studies in primary care focusing on a given specialty/disease are Linna et al (2003), who analysed oral health care in Finnish health centers through a DEA method, Amado and Dyson (2009), who analysed diabetes in primary care in the UK using DEA, Thanassoulis et al (1995) who used DEA to assess the provision of perinatal care in district health authorities in the UK, or Ozcan (1998) who used DEA to assess otitis media treatment by primary care physicians in the US. Even if these studies focus on a particular disease they still use different levels of analysis: physicians in Ozcan (1998), district health authorities in Thanassoulis et al (1995), and health centers in Linna et al (2003) and Amado and Dyson (2009).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if these studies focus on a particular disease they still use different levels of analysis: physicians in Ozcan (1998), district health authorities in Thanassoulis et al (1995), and health centers in Linna et al (2003) and Amado and Dyson (2009). Given the differences in the assessed disease in each of the above studies, the input/output specifications are also different and are not indeed comparable.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Podinovski (2007a) assesses production trade-offs and the corresponding weight restrictions in the context of higher education. Amado and Dyson (2009) and Amado and Santos (2009) use this method in applications of DEA to health care provision. Santos et al (2011) and Santos and Amado (2014) construct production trade-offs and weight restrictions for electricity distribution utilities and the court system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%