2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the tolerability of spatiotemporally complex electrical stimulation paradigms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these studies also revealed that continuous stimulation of these structures rapidly lead to a lack of response, probably due to a refractory period after each stimulation. Responsive approaches where stimulation is triggered at seizure onset after being detected online by processing brain signals (Kossoff et al, 2004;Osorio et al, 2005;Nelson et al, 2011) therefore appeared more appropriate, especially when seizure are frequent as it is the case in GAERS, as well as in some patients with absence epilepsy. Responsive stimulation offers three main potential advantages for clinical use when compared to continuous DBS: (i) a reduced power consumption of brain stimulators; (ii) a reduced neural adaptation to external stimulation; (iii) reduced behavioral or physiological side-effects (Fig.…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, these studies also revealed that continuous stimulation of these structures rapidly lead to a lack of response, probably due to a refractory period after each stimulation. Responsive approaches where stimulation is triggered at seizure onset after being detected online by processing brain signals (Kossoff et al, 2004;Osorio et al, 2005;Nelson et al, 2011) therefore appeared more appropriate, especially when seizure are frequent as it is the case in GAERS, as well as in some patients with absence epilepsy. Responsive stimulation offers three main potential advantages for clinical use when compared to continuous DBS: (i) a reduced power consumption of brain stimulators; (ii) a reduced neural adaptation to external stimulation; (iii) reduced behavioral or physiological side-effects (Fig.…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, with relatively minor modifications, the switch array can be expanded to 128 channels and setup to route electrode connections to external recording equipment when not being used for stimulation. Currently, neuroBi is being used preclinically to test spatiotemporally complex patterns of stimulation that have been proposed for suppressing epileptic seizures [40] and is being integrated into an existing closed-loop system for epileptic seizure detection and suppression [30] , [40] . It is also intended that neuroBi will be used in a seizure prediction system that probes cortical excitability using subdural electrodes [31] , for cortical mapping prior to surgical resection, and in a closed-loop deep brain stimulation system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies also revealed that open loop or 'continuous stimulation of these structures rapidly lead to a lack of response, probably due to a refractory period after each single stimulation'. Therefore,closed loop stimulation protocols, in which electrical stimulation will be triggered by seizure onset detected in real-time by the analyses of the ongoing EEG signals might be more appropriate [124][125][126][127][128], in particular when the seizure occurrence is high. It is obvious that this is indeed the casein the genetic animal models and inunmedicated AE patients.…”
Section: Subcortical Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%