2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Test-Taking Capabilities of Chatbots—From Surgeon to Sommelier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 6 , 15 , 16 , 17 Studies that have evaluated AI tools in clinical scenarios often fail to capture the nuances of real-world decision-making, where single best solutions are rare. 18 , 19 Rather, clinical judgments frequently hinge on the principle of what a competent peer would consider a reasonable course of action. 20 To our knowledge, AI tools have not been sufficiently evaluated in such contextual conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 , 15 , 16 , 17 Studies that have evaluated AI tools in clinical scenarios often fail to capture the nuances of real-world decision-making, where single best solutions are rare. 18 , 19 Rather, clinical judgments frequently hinge on the principle of what a competent peer would consider a reasonable course of action. 20 To our knowledge, AI tools have not been sufficiently evaluated in such contextual conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that users of these tools approach any AI-generated output with caution, as AI systems cannot be held responsible for any mishappenings, as Bressler notes . Furthermore, when using an AI chatbot for learning purposes, it is important to wholistically scrutinize its responses for inaccuracies …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%