A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship 2019
DOI: 10.4337/9781788972321.00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the terrain of social entrepreneurship: new directions, paths less travelled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Explicit attention to gender together with other intersecting social identities such as race/ ethnicity and migrant attributes, will reveal a more in-depth picture of individual social entrepreneurial trajectories and the characteristics of ecosystems that support diverse social entrepreneurs. Thus future research could effectively respond to the call for intersectional study of social entrepreneurship (de Bruin and Teasdale, 2019). Research across multiple country contexts, across different geographies with different institutional configurations and cultural expectations and with attention to the agency of social entrepreneurs of different backgrounds and identities, will ultimately reveal patterns in what is required to nurture social entrepreneurship from intention to realisation, and to grow sustainable and impactful social ventures.…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicit attention to gender together with other intersecting social identities such as race/ ethnicity and migrant attributes, will reveal a more in-depth picture of individual social entrepreneurial trajectories and the characteristics of ecosystems that support diverse social entrepreneurs. Thus future research could effectively respond to the call for intersectional study of social entrepreneurship (de Bruin and Teasdale, 2019). Research across multiple country contexts, across different geographies with different institutional configurations and cultural expectations and with attention to the agency of social entrepreneurs of different backgrounds and identities, will ultimately reveal patterns in what is required to nurture social entrepreneurship from intention to realisation, and to grow sustainable and impactful social ventures.…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, examining social entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia answers calls for furthering research in contexts other than Europe and North America (De Bruin & Teasdale, 2019;Kolk & Rivera-Santos, 2018;Tan Luc et al, 2022;Terjesen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Con Clus Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, examining discourse across all three types of legitimacy following Suchman's (1995) typology adopts a theoretically grounded approach and engages critically with research seeing social entrepreneurship as morally legitimated (Dart, 2004;Venot, 2016). Secondly, we contribute to counterbalancing the continued underrepresentation of the Global South in entrepreneurship research (De Bruin & Teasdale, 2019;Kolk & Rivera-Santos, 2018;Tan Luc et al, 2022;Terjesen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex dynamics and influencers of SE (de Bruin and Teasdale, 2019) urge researchers to develop more nuanced understandings of antecedents of SE (Ko and Kang, 2022). Deployment of context-embedded approaches (Hechavarría and Brieger, 2022) that enable interrogation of individuals’ thinking processes (Tiwari et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%