2016
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.2289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the technical pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of Taiwanese university physics instructors

Abstract: University science teachers' technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) is crucial for effective teaching. Although there has been a plethora of studies investigating pre-service and in-service teachers' TPACK, few studies have examined university instructors' TPACK and university students' perceptions of instructors' TPACK. The main purpose of this study was to examine the TPACK questionnaire differences between university students' perceptions and instructors' self-perceptions, and assess differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
10
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The last finding which is concerned with the gender of the participants showed that there was no significant difference in not only using overall TPACK of teacher educators but also applying knowledge of each dimension. This finding was in line with many findings which reported that there was no significant difference in the overall TPACK of instructors/teachers in terms of gender (Akturk & Ozturk, 2019;Jang & Chang, 2016). In contrast, the result of Ozudogru and Ozudogru (2019) which showed significant differences between gender was not consistent with the result of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last finding which is concerned with the gender of the participants showed that there was no significant difference in not only using overall TPACK of teacher educators but also applying knowledge of each dimension. This finding was in line with many findings which reported that there was no significant difference in the overall TPACK of instructors/teachers in terms of gender (Akturk & Ozturk, 2019;Jang & Chang, 2016). In contrast, the result of Ozudogru and Ozudogru (2019) which showed significant differences between gender was not consistent with the result of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, there were studies that tried to determine the factors which influence on teachers' TPACK levels. In addition, the results of many studies uncovered that gender and professional experience of teachers influenced their TPACK levels (Akturk & Ozturk, 2019;Alqurashi, Gokbel, & Carbonara, 2016;Jang & Chang, 2016;Ozudogru & Ozudogru, 2019).…”
Section: Importance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…purposeful setting up of educational goals in accordance with the purposes of the whole course of the educational process, monitoring and evaluating the efficiency of the chosen forms, methods, means, assessing current outcomes, correctional measures [8][9][10].…”
Section: Methodology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komponen Pengetahuan Konten Pedagogis Teknologi (Koehler & Mishra, 2009) Kecenderungan studi terbaru dalam teknologi pendidikan adalah TPACK (Koehler & Mishra (2006). Seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Jang (2016), ada dua aliran penelitian tentang TPACK yaitu terkait dengan TPACK guru pre-service dan in-service; dan persepsi siswa tentang TPACK yang dimiliki guru (Angeli & Valanides, 2009;Chai, et al, 2013;Jang, & Tsai, 2012;Koh, , Chai, , & Tsai, , 2010;Lee, & Tsai, 2010;Lin, et al, 2013;Niess, 2005 kognisi siswa dapat diberikan oleh persepsi siswa tentang guru mereka (Tuan, Chang, Wang, & Treagust, 2000) dan merupakan sumber penting untuk menilai pengetahuan instruktur yang berasal dari instruktur dan mahasiswa (Jaskyte et al, 2009). Mungkin, pandangan mereka tidak sama dengan evaluasi kelas.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified