2014
DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2014.981577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the spatial variation in quality-adjusted rental prices and identifying hot spots in Berlin’s residential property market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is clear evidence that many socio‐economic, geographic and demographic data used in the empirical analysis of regional science are characterised by the presence of spatial heterogeneity and spatial clustering. This can be found in some studies of the real estate market (e.g., Baumont, 2009; an de Meulen & Mitze, 2014; Cellmer et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2019), the location and/or economic performance of firms (e.g., Nilsson & Smirnov, 2017; Nilsson et al, 2019), the spatial distribution of poverty (e.g., Curtis et al, 2019; Oteng‐Abayie et al, 2022), local employment (e.g., Bradley et al, 2020), international migration (e.g., Hierro et al, 2013) and the regional distribution of per capita GDP, (e.g., Le Gallo & Ertur, 2003), among others. The inclusion of such information about the natural clustering of the data is captured through the inclusion in the weights of similarities or dissimilarities within neighbourhoods and between neighbourhoods in the predictor using either the local Moran's index or similarity measures between neighbourhoods via medians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…There is clear evidence that many socio‐economic, geographic and demographic data used in the empirical analysis of regional science are characterised by the presence of spatial heterogeneity and spatial clustering. This can be found in some studies of the real estate market (e.g., Baumont, 2009; an de Meulen & Mitze, 2014; Cellmer et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2019), the location and/or economic performance of firms (e.g., Nilsson & Smirnov, 2017; Nilsson et al, 2019), the spatial distribution of poverty (e.g., Curtis et al, 2019; Oteng‐Abayie et al, 2022), local employment (e.g., Bradley et al, 2020), international migration (e.g., Hierro et al, 2013) and the regional distribution of per capita GDP, (e.g., Le Gallo & Ertur, 2003), among others. The inclusion of such information about the natural clustering of the data is captured through the inclusion in the weights of similarities or dissimilarities within neighbourhoods and between neighbourhoods in the predictor using either the local Moran's index or similarity measures between neighbourhoods via medians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Non-significant is the final group which indicates no significant spatial autocorrelation in the distribution of values. LISA statistics are useful for identifying clusters in the spatial arrangement of a variable, they have commonly been applied to house prices 58,59 .…”
Section: Lisa Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%