2015
DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-2969-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing: the impact of synoptic weather, regional transport and heterogeneous reactions

Abstract: Extreme haze episodes repeatedly shrouded Beijing during the winter of 2012-2013, causing major environmental and health problems. To better understand these extreme events, we performed a model-assisted analysis of the hourly observation data of PM2.5 and its major chemical compositions. The synthetic analysis shows that (1) the severe winter haze was driven by stable synoptic meteorological conditions over northeastern China, and not by an abrupt increase in anthropogenic emissions. (2) Secondary species, in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

37
544
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 826 publications
(583 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
37
544
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows that on more polluted days, the decrease in PM 2.5 concentration is generally larger, indicating that the emission control measures in the residential sector decreased PM 2.5 concentrations more when air pollution concentrations were higher. During the heavy polluted periods in winter, the North China Plain is often dominated by a weak high-pressure system with low surface winds (13), which leads to weak mixing and diffusion; hence, emission reductions during those periods are particularly beneficial to local regions. In the BJR scenario, the average PM 2.5 concentration in Beijing decreased by 14 ± 7 μg·m −3 (mean and SD of 59-d daily average values) and the BASE PM 2.5 concentration decreased by 22 ± 6%.…”
Section: Annualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 shows that on more polluted days, the decrease in PM 2.5 concentration is generally larger, indicating that the emission control measures in the residential sector decreased PM 2.5 concentrations more when air pollution concentrations were higher. During the heavy polluted periods in winter, the North China Plain is often dominated by a weak high-pressure system with low surface winds (13), which leads to weak mixing and diffusion; hence, emission reductions during those periods are particularly beneficial to local regions. In the BJR scenario, the average PM 2.5 concentration in Beijing decreased by 14 ± 7 μg·m −3 (mean and SD of 59-d daily average values) and the BASE PM 2.5 concentration decreased by 22 ± 6%.…”
Section: Annualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, on the basis of the latest national Ambient Air Quality Standards of China (GB3095-2012), the haze day is defined as a day with daily-averaged PM 2.5 concentration over 75 µg m −3 . The haze pollution episode is defined as the event that a set of continuous days with dailyaveraged PM 2.5 concentration exceeding 75 µg m −3 , which has been used to distinguish non-haze and haze episode in the literature (Che et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2015Zheng et al, , 2016. During this campaign, there were four haze pollution episodes at Wangdu site as follows: Episode 1 (4-6 June), Episode 2 (12-17 June), Episode 3 (29 June-3 July) and Episode 4 (5-7 July) with elevated average PM 2.5 concentrations (75, 92, 79 and 99 µg m −3 , respectively).…”
Section: General Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary aerosol formation potential of the air is essential for understanding the origins of the secondary aerosols and predicting their impacts on haze pollution. High growth rates of secondary species and high number concentrations of particles were frequently observed during heavy haze pollution in Beijing Jiang et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2013;Sun et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014c;Zheng et al, 2015), indicating a high secondary aerosol formation potential of the air. Most of the related studies on the aerosol pollution in Beijing have focused on the chemical composition or the seasonal variations and sources of PM 2.5 (Guo et al, 2014;He et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%