2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.99.102004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the sensitivity of gravitational wave detectors to neutron star physics

Abstract: The physics of neutron stars can be studied with gravitational waves emitted from coalescing binary systems. Tidal effects become significant during the last few orbits and can be visible in the gravitational-wave spectrum above 500 Hz. After the merger, the neutron star remnant oscillates at frequencies above 1 kHz and can collapse into a black hole. Gravitational-wave detectors with a sensitivity of 10 −24 strain/ √Hz at 2−4 kHz can observe these oscillations from a source which is ∼ 100 Mpc away. The curren… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
2
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantum noise at low frequencies (QRPN) will remain unchanged. This differs our approach from other designs targeting the high-frequency sensitivity [44][45][46]. The QRPN can be suppressed independently using already developed approaches using frequency dependent squeezing, variational readout or quantum non-demolition measurements [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantum noise at low frequencies (QRPN) will remain unchanged. This differs our approach from other designs targeting the high-frequency sensitivity [44][45][46]. The QRPN can be suppressed independently using already developed approaches using frequency dependent squeezing, variational readout or quantum non-demolition measurements [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…χ = 0) in the typical operational range of GW observatories Ω ω s , the input-output relation Eq. (6) reduces to the standard one for a baseline GWO [43,44], with the detection bandwidth given by: γ baseline = ω 2 s /γ = cT ITM /(T SE L arm ). Second, the noise term in Eq.…”
Section: Quantum Boost Of High-frequency Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain sensitivity of the detector does not always improve by scaling the detector as other fundamental sources of noise also change by scaling the length of the detector [56]. As the gravitational wave spectrum of supernovae has some power in a few kilohertz range, we allow the arm length to vary independently similar to the analysis by [53,57]. Our simulations indicated the optimal length to be close to 40 km, the upper bound value allowed for the length parameter.…”
Section: A Broadband Configuration Tuned For Supernovaementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We optimize over the length of the signal recycling cavity (L src ) and the transmissivity of the signal recycling mirror (T srm ) to maximize the CCSN detection range. The quantum resonant sidebands can be tuned with these parameters and we exploit this behavior for supernovae tuning similar to the approach used by Buonanno et al [52] and Martynov et al [53].…”
Section: A Broadband Configuration Tuned For Supernovaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17], which assumes T SRC 1, starts to break down. We also need to take into account the frequency dependent propagation phase of the sidebands, which leads to the following expression for the coupling constant constant [18]:…”
Section: B Interferometer As Detector and Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%