2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the selective constraint on the sizes of insertions and deletions in 5' untranslated regions in mammals

Abstract: BackgroundSmall insertions and deletions ("indels" with size ≦ 100 bp) whose lengths are not multiples of three (non-3n) are strongly constrained and depleted in protein-coding sequences. Such a constraint has never been reported in noncoding genomic regions. In 5'untranslated regions (5'UTRs) in mammalian genomes, upstream start codons (uAUGs) and upstream open reading frames (uORFs) can regulate protein translation. The presence of non-3n indels in uORFs can potentially disrupt the functions of these regulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic variation serves as an evolution driver, and is affected by selection pressure during plant evolution. Thus, CDS is under stronger selection pressure compared with UTR [ 18 ], and indels with sizes of multiples of three not resulting in frameshift mutation suffer less selection pressure [ 19 ], because indels are expected to be deleterious when they occur in functional sequences, especially coding regions where frameshift can be induced [ 20 ]. Here, the genetic variation frequencies were lower in CDS than in UTR, and 3n-indels had higher frequencies compared to non-3n indels with adjacent sizes in CDS but not in UTR (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic variation serves as an evolution driver, and is affected by selection pressure during plant evolution. Thus, CDS is under stronger selection pressure compared with UTR [ 18 ], and indels with sizes of multiples of three not resulting in frameshift mutation suffer less selection pressure [ 19 ], because indels are expected to be deleterious when they occur in functional sequences, especially coding regions where frameshift can be induced [ 20 ]. Here, the genetic variation frequencies were lower in CDS than in UTR, and 3n-indels had higher frequencies compared to non-3n indels with adjacent sizes in CDS but not in UTR (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5'UTRs contain at least two types of translational regulatory elements—uORFs and G4s. The presence or absence of these regulatory elements can be altered by AS or AP [ 29 , 73 , 74 , 75 ]. These two types of regulatory mechanisms may occur separately or concurrently [ 76 ].…”
Section: Alternative 5'utr and Translational Regulations In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By definition, the AUG codon should be located in 5'UTR, but not necessarily in the first exon. The stop codon can be located either in 5'UTR or in CDS [ 74 ]. The sequence contexts of 5'UTRs can influence the efficiency of translational regulations of uORFs, including the length of 5'UTR, the number of uORFs in the 5'UTR, the Kozak sequence context of the uORF, and whether the uORF overlaps with the downstream main CDS [ 77 , 78 ].…”
Section: Alternative 5'utr and Translational Regulations In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the former case, AS may lead to significant changes in protein sequences or the initiation of nonsense-mediated decay [26,27], thus adding another layer of regulatory complexity. In the latter case, the altered UTR sequences may cause changes in transcriptional or translational regulations [28][29][30][31]. Fourthly, CSEs and ASEs are known to have significantly different evolutionary rates [25,32], and different paths of evolution [33].…”
Section: The Biological Significance Of Exon Classification In Alternmentioning
confidence: 99%