2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the scope of practice and training of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in England, Italy and Belgium: a qualitative study

Abstract: Variations exist in the training and scope of practice of OBGYN specialists among these three countries, which could have significant implications for the expectations of patients seeking care and specialists practising in other EU countries. Changes within the specialty and advances in technology are creating new opportunities and challenges, although these may widen existing differences. Harmonisation of the training and scope of practice of OBGYN within Europe remains a distant goal. Further research on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no obvious correlation between the type of institution involved and the severity of measures imposed, suggesting that, despite considerable differences, a convergence of disciplinary approaches might be feasible. However, Risso-Gill et al 10 noted how regulatory institutions with broader remits, such as those in Austria, Germany and the UK, reported employing severe sanctions more frequently when presented with a range of examples of professional misconduct. Furthermore, the variability of disciplinary processes found in participating member states implies that a harmonisation of procedures across the board would require detailed analysis of existing structures and the inclusion of alternative options where fundamental differences exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no obvious correlation between the type of institution involved and the severity of measures imposed, suggesting that, despite considerable differences, a convergence of disciplinary approaches might be feasible. However, Risso-Gill et al 10 noted how regulatory institutions with broader remits, such as those in Austria, Germany and the UK, reported employing severe sanctions more frequently when presented with a range of examples of professional misconduct. Furthermore, the variability of disciplinary processes found in participating member states implies that a harmonisation of procedures across the board would require detailed analysis of existing structures and the inclusion of alternative options where fundamental differences exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, advances in technology have expanded the field of obstetrics and gynecology and made training and developing skills in different subspecialties a great challenge. 8 , 9 It seems that candidates preferred scientific research that enabled them to gain skills, and ultrasonography represented the first choice. Ultrasonography is relatively easy to learn, with great application in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United Kingdom and Australia, the introduction of combined early pregnancy and acute gynecological units led to a drop in hospital admissions, improved patients' satisfaction, accounted for significant cost savings and decreased ED occupancy [6] [7] [8]. In France and Italy, similar results were obtained by hospital-based emergency services run by obstetriciangynecologists [9] [10]. Striking similarities exist between emergency medicine physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists: caring for unscheduled patients with urgent health problems, dealing with unanticipated crises, facing circadian disruption, coping with medical legal liability and work related stress are only few of the features these providers share [11] [12] [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%