2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.075015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the robustness of stellar cooling constraints on light particles

Abstract: Stellar cooling arguments place strict restrictions on a wide variety of models of new physics. In this paper, we argue that mechanisms to evade these constraints are restricted by thermodynamic arguments, and then present a minimal model extension that allows new particles to evade all stellar constraints. In doing this, we demonstrate that interesting parameter space can be reopened, using the EDGES signal and Xenon1T excess as examples. This mechanism highlights the importance of laboratory experiments in a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various types of radiative interactions giving contributions to the stellar cooling process [158]. While some of the astrophysical observations are subject to large uncertainties in both the measurement and the model [159], a large region in the parameter space (G R , m N ) preserving DM constraints (2.12)-(2.14) is offered to be consistent with both the astrophysical observation and XENON1T new results.…”
Section: Jhep12(2020)194mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…There are various types of radiative interactions giving contributions to the stellar cooling process [158]. While some of the astrophysical observations are subject to large uncertainties in both the measurement and the model [159], a large region in the parameter space (G R , m N ) preserving DM constraints (2.12)-(2.14) is offered to be consistent with both the astrophysical observation and XENON1T new results.…”
Section: Jhep12(2020)194mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We show only the strongest existing constraints on the relevant parameter space. In principle, astrophysical bounds on our scenario could also apply, however, these are typically weaker than those discussed here and are less robust (see [56][57][58] for recent discussions). For the sake of clarity, these constraints are presented for the standard galactic UDM halo only.…”
Section: Search For Oscillating Fundamental Constantsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This goes beyond that excluded by previous direct laboratory experiments searching for ALP-mediated exotic pseudo-scalar interactions between protons that have shown that f int ≳ 300 GeV over the ALP mass range probed by GNOME 39 . Although astrophysical observations suggest that f int ≳ 2 × 10 8 GeV, there are a variety of scenarios in which such astrophysical constraints can be evaded 40 , 41 . The parameter space for f int and m a explored in this search is well outside the typical predictions for axions in quantum chromodynamics 42 , 43 .…”
Section: Constraints On Alp Domain Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%