2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Resilience of Urban Systems Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the paper refers to the assessment of different urban regeneration scenarios for the city of Collegno (Italy). Differently from Bottero et al [11], who modeled urban resilience dynamics in Collegno by using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, and complementing Bottero et al [12] who combined Stakeholder Analysis and Stated Preference Methods to assess the social value of urban regeneration scenarios in Collegno and their related willingness to pay, we combine the PROMETHEE approach with SWOT Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis, to rank six urban regeneration alternatives and identify the solution that outranks the others, thus providing decision-makers with useful tools in making welfare-maximizing urban planning decisions. We thus aim to contribute framing a multimethodological evaluation process which can be transferred, once validated, in other decision contexts [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the paper refers to the assessment of different urban regeneration scenarios for the city of Collegno (Italy). Differently from Bottero et al [11], who modeled urban resilience dynamics in Collegno by using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, and complementing Bottero et al [12] who combined Stakeholder Analysis and Stated Preference Methods to assess the social value of urban regeneration scenarios in Collegno and their related willingness to pay, we combine the PROMETHEE approach with SWOT Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis, to rank six urban regeneration alternatives and identify the solution that outranks the others, thus providing decision-makers with useful tools in making welfare-maximizing urban planning decisions. We thus aim to contribute framing a multimethodological evaluation process which can be transferred, once validated, in other decision contexts [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, by means of Stakeholders Analysis the complexity of the decisional process can be represented, suggesting the evaluation criteria to be considered for the comparison of the alternative strategies ( Figure 1). In detail, starting from the alternatives analyzed by Bottero et al [11,12], we have selected six alternative projects, which we consider the most relevant according to the SWOT and Stakeholders Analyses. These alternatives can be described as follows ( Figure 2):…”
Section: Structuring Of the Decision Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This sensitivity analysis is based on the "one-at-a-time" approach. The OAT approach [41][42][43] is used to validate the reliability of the outputs delivered by landscape and territorial evaluations, such as in the case of systems of indicators and indices. Specifically, the OAT approach increases the performance of the system of indicators by varying the weight of a single indicator and maintaining the other indicators on their central values.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis can increase the reliability of the model and thus, reduce the uncertainty of parameters used in the models. A very common sensitivity test is the One-At-Time approach (OAT) [89] that is often used in Multicriteria Analysis as final tuning [75,90,91]. This, in fact, facilitates the scenarios' assessment when actors and stakeholders are involved in a participatory decision-making process [92,93].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%