Abstract:SUMMARY1. Identifying the existence of short or narrow range endemic species is an important issue when planning for conservation of groundwater fauna in the face of threats to groundwater quantity and quality. 2. Fourteen bores were sampled six times over 3 or 4 years to assess the reliability of nethauling sampling in broad-scale survey to collect the groundwater fauna present at a site and to identify short-range endemic (SRE) species. 3. Species accumulation curves suggested that one sample from a bore col… Show more
“…data), bringing considerable insight to a poorly known group of arachnids. Many species are known to be endemic to individual geological formations, such as pisolitic mesas only a few hundred hectares in area , and no species are known from an area greater than 500 km 2 , clearly conforming to current definitions of short-range endemism (Harvey 2002;Eberhard et al 2009;Environmental Protection Authority 2009). Knowledge of the taxonomy and distribution of different species and genera has been refined with each new discovery, and recent molecular phylogeographic research has highlighted the evolutionary inter-relationships among species ) and the remarkable subterranean biogeography of the region (summarised in Guzik et al 2011a).…”
“…These factors can all lead to evolutionary diversification over time and to highly restricted modern distributions. Harvey (2002) suggested a nominal range of less than 10 000 km 2 as a working definition of short-range endemism, but Eberhard et al (2009), considering stygofauna, recommended a reduced area of less than 1000 km 2 . Even this may need further refinement as, for example, groundwater calcrete aquifers of the southern Western Shield (Yilgarn) each have unique faunas largely comprising endemic species (Humphreys 2008;Guzik et al 2011a;and references therein).…”
Abstract.A major challenge confronting many contemporary systematists is how to integrate standard taxonomic research with conservation outcomes. With a biodiversity crisis looming and ongoing impediments to taxonomy, how can systematic research continue to document species and infer the 'Tree of Life', and still maintain its significance to conservation science and to protecting the very species it strives to understand? Here we advocate a systematic research program dedicated to documenting short-range endemic taxa, which are species with naturally small distributions and, by their very nature, most likely to be threatened by habitat loss, habitat degradation and climate change. This research can dovetail with the needs of industry and government to obtain high-quality data to inform the assessment of impacts of major development projects that affect landscapes and their biological heritage. We highlight how these projects are assessed using criteria mandated by Western Australian legislation and informed by guidance statements issued by the Environmental Protection Authority (Western Australia). To illustrate slightly different biological scenarios, we also provide three case studies from the Pilbara region of Western Australia, which include examples demonstrating a rapid rise in the collection and documentation of diverse and previously unknown subterranean and surface faunas, as well as how biological surveys can clarify the status of species thought to be rare or potentially threatened. We argue that 'whole of biota' surveys (that include all invertebrates) are rarely fundable and are logistically impossible, and that concentrated research on some of the most vulnerable elements in the landscape -short-range endemics, including troglofauna and stygofauna -can help to enhance conservation and research outcomes.
“…data), bringing considerable insight to a poorly known group of arachnids. Many species are known to be endemic to individual geological formations, such as pisolitic mesas only a few hundred hectares in area , and no species are known from an area greater than 500 km 2 , clearly conforming to current definitions of short-range endemism (Harvey 2002;Eberhard et al 2009;Environmental Protection Authority 2009). Knowledge of the taxonomy and distribution of different species and genera has been refined with each new discovery, and recent molecular phylogeographic research has highlighted the evolutionary inter-relationships among species ) and the remarkable subterranean biogeography of the region (summarised in Guzik et al 2011a).…”
“…These factors can all lead to evolutionary diversification over time and to highly restricted modern distributions. Harvey (2002) suggested a nominal range of less than 10 000 km 2 as a working definition of short-range endemism, but Eberhard et al (2009), considering stygofauna, recommended a reduced area of less than 1000 km 2 . Even this may need further refinement as, for example, groundwater calcrete aquifers of the southern Western Shield (Yilgarn) each have unique faunas largely comprising endemic species (Humphreys 2008;Guzik et al 2011a;and references therein).…”
Abstract.A major challenge confronting many contemporary systematists is how to integrate standard taxonomic research with conservation outcomes. With a biodiversity crisis looming and ongoing impediments to taxonomy, how can systematic research continue to document species and infer the 'Tree of Life', and still maintain its significance to conservation science and to protecting the very species it strives to understand? Here we advocate a systematic research program dedicated to documenting short-range endemic taxa, which are species with naturally small distributions and, by their very nature, most likely to be threatened by habitat loss, habitat degradation and climate change. This research can dovetail with the needs of industry and government to obtain high-quality data to inform the assessment of impacts of major development projects that affect landscapes and their biological heritage. We highlight how these projects are assessed using criteria mandated by Western Australian legislation and informed by guidance statements issued by the Environmental Protection Authority (Western Australia). To illustrate slightly different biological scenarios, we also provide three case studies from the Pilbara region of Western Australia, which include examples demonstrating a rapid rise in the collection and documentation of diverse and previously unknown subterranean and surface faunas, as well as how biological surveys can clarify the status of species thought to be rare or potentially threatened. We argue that 'whole of biota' surveys (that include all invertebrates) are rarely fundable and are logistically impossible, and that concentrated research on some of the most vulnerable elements in the landscape -short-range endemics, including troglofauna and stygofauna -can help to enhance conservation and research outcomes.
“…Marmonier (2002, 2003), Karanovic (2003aKaranovic ( , 2003bKaranovic ( , 2004Karanovic ( , 2005aKaranovic ( , 2005bKaranovic ( , 2007) Copepoda Karanovic, T. Pesce and De Laurentiis (1996), Pesce et al (1996aPesce et al ( , 1996b, Karanovic et al (2001), Karanovic and Pesce (2002), Karanovic (2003Karanovic ( , 2004aKaranovic ( , 2004bKaranovic ( , 2005Karanovic ( , 2006 (1998) points (bores or caves). In this case, extrapolation of richness estimates was based on accumulation curves as outlined by Eberhard et al (2009). Second, in the Yilgarn region, since subterranean taxa are restricted to calcretes, and each sampled calcrete was found to have a unique fauna, extrapolation of the data from sampled to unsampled calcretes was warranted.…”
Section: Methodology For Estimating Subterranean Faunal Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, 560 stygofauna species were estimated from the Western Shield and this area comprises~50% of the area examined in this study, thus clearly representing an underestimate of species richness based on the data presented here. Just for the Pilbara region, which represents an even smaller area of the Western Shield, Eberhard et al (2009) estimated 500-550 undescribed species using species accumulation curves. Our results show that much of the subterranean taxa in the western half of Australia remain undiscovered and the potential for new species discovery is extremely high.…”
Section: Australia-wide Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Government and privately funded research in the past five years has primarily focussed on the fauna of the Yilgarn and Pilbara regions of WA and aquifers in SA, in particular utilising boreholes and drill holes installed for exploration and exploitation of water, minerals and monitoring of groundwater levels and salinity, rather than fauna. This work has revealed a diverse subterranean fauna inhabiting both aquatic and terrestrial habitats found in a wide range of substrates, including alluvium, calcretes, fractured rock, karst in soft and hard rock, pisolites and pseudokarst in lava and sandstone Humphreys 1998, 2003;Finston and Johnson 2004;Eberhard et al 2005;Harvey et al 2008;Humphreys 2008;Eberhard et al 2009). Many of the resultant data are unavailable publicly during the EIA process but many become public after formal environmental approvals occur.…”
Abstract. Australia was historically considered a poor prospect for subterranean fauna but, in reality, the continent holds a great variety of subterranean habitats, with associated faunas, found both in karst and non-karst environments. This paper critically examines the diversity of subterranean fauna in several key regions for the mostly arid western half of Australia. We aimed to document levels of species richness for major taxon groups and examine the degree of uniqueness of the fauna. We also wanted to compare the composition of these ecosystems, and their origins, with other regions of subterranean diversity world-wide. Using information on the number of 'described' and 'known' invertebrate species (recognised based on morphological and/or molecular data), we predict that the total subterranean fauna for the western half of the continent is 4140 species, of which~10% is described and 9% is 'known' but not yet described. The stygofauna, water beetles, ostracods and copepods have the largest number of described species, while arachnids dominate the described troglofauna. Conversely, copepods, water beetles and isopods are the poorest known groups with less than 20% described species, while hexapods (comprising mostly Collembola, Coleoptera, Blattodea and Hemiptera) are the least known of the troglofauna. Compared with other regions of the world, we consider the Australian subterranean fauna to be unique in its diversity compared with the northern hemisphere for three key reasons: the range and diversity of subterranean habitats is both extensive and novel; direct faunal links to ancient Pangaea and Gondwana are evident, emphasising their early biogeographic history; and Miocene aridification, rather than Pleistocene post-ice age driven diversification events
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.