2021
DOI: 10.1177/23197145211023407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Relationship Between Extended 3Ps and Store Choice: Moderating Role of Consumer Demographics

Abstract: This study is an attempt to bridge the link between factors representing stores’ decision boundaries and consumers’ decision-making criteria. It also explores the impact of consumer demographic variables on the relationship between the influence of extended 3Ps (process, people and physical evidence) and store choice. Around 290 responses were found suitable for further statistical refinements through a structured survey. After carrying out the reliability and validity properties of the data, structure equatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous factors influence consumer store preference, including demographic variables (Bansal & Gupta, 2021; Mehra & Shakeel, 2016), perceived risk (Maziriri & Mokoena, 2016; Rossetti et al, 2022), marketing initiatives (Lindquist & Sirgy, 2006), store image (Lee et al, 2010; Thompson & Chen, 1998), as well as personal values (De Ferran & Grunert, 2007; Haridasan & Fernando, 2018). Specifically, a consumer who wishes to extend his/her self‐esteem (a terminal value) (Amatulli & Guido, 2011; Walker & Olson, 1991) through clothing is more likely to patronise a clothing store or brand that best portrays a particular, desired image (Shan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous factors influence consumer store preference, including demographic variables (Bansal & Gupta, 2021; Mehra & Shakeel, 2016), perceived risk (Maziriri & Mokoena, 2016; Rossetti et al, 2022), marketing initiatives (Lindquist & Sirgy, 2006), store image (Lee et al, 2010; Thompson & Chen, 1998), as well as personal values (De Ferran & Grunert, 2007; Haridasan & Fernando, 2018). Specifically, a consumer who wishes to extend his/her self‐esteem (a terminal value) (Amatulli & Guido, 2011; Walker & Olson, 1991) through clothing is more likely to patronise a clothing store or brand that best portrays a particular, desired image (Shan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%