2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the radial evolution of interplanetary coronal mass ejections using EUHFORIA

Abstract: Context. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large-scale eruptions coming from the Sun and transiting into interplanetary space. While it is widely known that they are major drivers of space weather, further knowledge of CME properties in the inner heliosphere is limited by the scarcity of observations at heliocentric distances other than 1 au. In addition, most CMEs are observed in situ by a single spacecraft and in-depth studies require numerical models to complement the few available observations. Aims. We ai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
4
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For obtaining additional uncertainty estimates we use Helios results from previous studies and add upper and lower boundaries for the ME density (Liu et al 2005; Wang et al 2005;Leitner et al 2007). For an uncertainty estimate of the density evolution of the ambient solar wind, we apply results from observations (Venzmer & Bothmer 2018) as well as recent model results from e.g., Scolini et al (2021), and use the standard deviation for the uncertainty estimate of the sheath density. Inspecting the linear fits for ME and sheath density, we obtain three intersection sectors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For obtaining additional uncertainty estimates we use Helios results from previous studies and add upper and lower boundaries for the ME density (Liu et al 2005; Wang et al 2005;Leitner et al 2007). For an uncertainty estimate of the density evolution of the ambient solar wind, we apply results from observations (Venzmer & Bothmer 2018) as well as recent model results from e.g., Scolini et al (2021), and use the standard deviation for the uncertainty estimate of the sheath density. Inspecting the linear fits for ME and sheath density, we obtain three intersection sectors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 0.3 au (Figure 4, second row) the CME crosssection has expanded to an effective half-width of ∼ 60 • , indicating an over-expansion in the early stage of the propagation (Scolini et al 2019(Scolini et al , 2021. By the time the CME reaches 0.3 au, significant differences are visible in the CME cross-section and in the spatial distribution of the classification types between the two runs.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Cme Complexity As a Function Of Distancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The following initial parameters are used: radial speed equal to 800 km s −1 ; initial halfwidth of 45 • ; positive chirality (H = +1) with axial tilt (γ) of 90 • with respect to the northward direction (corresponding to a SWN flux-rope type; see Bothmer & Schwenn 1998); toroidal magnetic flux (ϕ t ) equal to 10 14 Wb (corresponding to a magnetic field strength of ∼ 25 nT at 1 au). Because of the pressure imbalance between the CME and the surrounding solar wind upon insertion in the heliospheric domain (leading to an expansion of the CME structure, as shown by Scolini et al 2019Scolini et al , 2021, the effective initial CME speed is ∼ 1100 km s −1 , which results in a fast CME that drives an interplanetary shock and sheath, as discussed in Section 3. Such a combination of initial parameters is representative of those of a typical fast CME with a reconnected flux of the order of 10 14 Wb (Pal et al 2018).…”
Section: Modeling Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dashed vertical line in Fig. 2 indicates the arrival time of the simulated flux rope, which was determined following the methodology of Scolini et al (2021). At the entry into the CME flux rope, the measured magnetic field exhibited a sudden increase, whereas in the simulation the arrival of the flux rope occurred ∼9 h later, showing a much more gradual increase in the magnetic field magnitude.…”
Section: Simulating the Cme With Euhforiamentioning
confidence: 99%