2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02186-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the psychological antecedents of private and public sphere behaviours to reduce household plastic consumption

Abstract: In the last few years, plastic has become an issue of current interest as tremendous ecological effects from plastic littering have become visible. Taking the role of consumers into account, activities comprising purchasing decisions and political engagement are expected to help prevent plastic pollution. The goal of this study was to examine antecedents of three potential plastic reduction activities: purchasing, activism, and policy support. Based on well-established psychological models of pro-environmental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Intentions to use plastic. We used an adapted scale based on Heidbreder et al (2022). For three items (e.g., "When thinking about my next grocery shopping, I will not buy fruits/vegetable that is packed in plastic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intentions to use plastic. We used an adapted scale based on Heidbreder et al (2022). For three items (e.g., "When thinking about my next grocery shopping, I will not buy fruits/vegetable that is packed in plastic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study by Chi [29] examined how ethical consumer behavior can increase the social acceptance of environmentally friendly plastic items. In a further study, the psychological predispositions leading to both private and public anti-plastic behaviors were examined [30]. These predispositions included intentions, perceived behavioral control, personal norms, collective efficacy, and sufficiency orientation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another argument favoring the NAM is that it can explain why people engage pro-environmentally even when it is somewhat costly or inconvenient (van der Werff & Steg, 2015). The NAM has been approved empirically as a valid account for various types of IEE (e.g., Heidbreder et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2017;Munerah et al, 2021;Steg & de Groot, 2010).…”
Section: Individual Social-cognitive Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%