2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.03.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the PROTAC degron candidates: OBHSA with different side chains as novel selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For proteins without known ligands, structural modification of a substrate may lead to the generation of a compound capable of competing with the substrate for the binding pocket and thus can be used as ligands for PROTAC design. For proteins with numerous inhibitors, the binding affinity, physicochemical properties and synthetic feasibility are important factors in ligand selection 40–42 . Compared with that of small‐molecule inhibitors, the efficacy of PROTACs has a low correlation with the binding affinity of ligands for a POI because even temporary binding is enough to induce degradation.…”
Section: General Strategies For the Design And Optimization Of Protacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For proteins without known ligands, structural modification of a substrate may lead to the generation of a compound capable of competing with the substrate for the binding pocket and thus can be used as ligands for PROTAC design. For proteins with numerous inhibitors, the binding affinity, physicochemical properties and synthetic feasibility are important factors in ligand selection 40–42 . Compared with that of small‐molecule inhibitors, the efficacy of PROTACs has a low correlation with the binding affinity of ligands for a POI because even temporary binding is enough to induce degradation.…”
Section: General Strategies For the Design And Optimization Of Protacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For proteins with numerous inhibitors, the binding affinity, physicochemical properties and synthetic feasibility are important factors in ligand selection. [40][41][42] Compared with that of small-molecule inhibitors, the efficacy of PROTACs has a low correlation with the binding affinity of ligands for a POI because even temporary binding is enough to induce degradation. Theoretically, all POI ligands could be applied to the design of a PROTAC.…”
Section: General Strategies For the Design And Optimization Of Protacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROTAC-2, PROTAC-B, compound 24, compound 11, and estrogen receptor degrader (ERD)-148, among other PROTACs, have been designed to induce the reduction of ERα levels in BC cells (Figure 3) [99][100][101]. PROTAC-2 was designed with an estradiol molecule to bind to ERα and the phosphopeptide of IκBα that recruits SCF β-trcp Ub ligase complex, leading to ERα degradation [102].…”
Section: Protacs For Erαmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, compounds with basic side chains (Table16, 153-155) were efficient ERα degraders and moderate antiproliferative agents (IC 50 values in the micromolar range). [87] Docking studies revealed the formation of a novel hydrogen bond between the basic side chain and Thr-347 in addition to hydrophobic repulsion with the backbone of Met343, which would drive h3 distortion. However, some of the analogues with basic side chains did not exhibit potency to degrade ERα.…”
Section: Oxabicycloheptene Sulfonamides (Obhsa)mentioning
confidence: 99%