Exploring the Practice of Evaluation in Corporate Venturing

Abstract

Venturing activities have become a cornerstone of corporates’ innovation strategies but remain subject to high failure rates. Failure reasons comprise especially poor evaluation qualities, resulting in suboptimal resource allocations. In this study, we investigate the practice of evaluation in corporate venturing by analyzing primary data from 21 in-depth interviews with managers of internal corporate venturing (ICV) programs. We find that the evaluation elements (1) evaluation dates, (2) evaluation methodologies, and (3) evaluation bodies are not isolated — as often suggested by prior research — but interdependent by determining each other. By developing a better understanding of the specific relationships among the main evaluation elements in ICV programs, we contribute to the corporate venturing literature and provide guidance for practitioners.

Patents and Sustainable Medical Treatment in Developing Countries: Lessons from COVID-19 Vaccines

“…Ultimately, we conducted 12 interviews between August and October 2021 to address the research question, although one interview was excluded from the data analysis due to unrelated answers to the interview questions. Following prior research [44], the interviews were conducted remotely via calls to ensure safety during the COVID-19 pandemic and to avoid distress from the interviewee being influenced by the researchers' presence and the question options [45]. Some of the experts requested to remain anonymous; therefore, they are presented here by number (e.g., E1, E2).…”

Family Firm Value in the Acquisition Context: A Signaling Theory Perspective

“…Therefore, cross-industry acquirers are expected to rely more on the family firm status signal to adapt a target’s firm value. By contrast, acquirers operating in the same or related industry domain as a target are better positioned to evaluate an acquisition opportunity based on more and better-quality information (Ahuja & Katila, 2001; Cordes et al, 2021; Graham et al, 2017). Hence, within-industry acquirers are more likely than cross-industry acquirers to understand what part of business performance can be attributed to the targets themselves (i.e., their characteristics) rather than other factors, such as the market conditions in a particular industry.…”