2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the potential for geotourism development in the Danube region of Serbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serbia currently has one geopark (Djerdap), which is also quite recent, as it was inscribed on the UNESCO Global Geopark list in 2020. Nevertheless, Serbia has a truly diverse geoheritage, which has already been reported in several studies, and among which karst objects are also significant (Tomić and Božić 2014;Maran Stevanović 2015, Božić andTomić 2015;Tomić et al 2019Tomić et al , 2020Antić et al 2020a, b;Petrović et al 2020). However, no international publication has yet been published on the geoheritage of Tara NP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Serbia currently has one geopark (Djerdap), which is also quite recent, as it was inscribed on the UNESCO Global Geopark list in 2020. Nevertheless, Serbia has a truly diverse geoheritage, which has already been reported in several studies, and among which karst objects are also significant (Tomić and Božić 2014;Maran Stevanović 2015, Božić andTomić 2015;Tomić et al 2019Tomić et al , 2020Antić et al 2020a, b;Petrović et al 2020). However, no international publication has yet been published on the geoheritage of Tara NP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Its advantage is that it integrates the opinions of both tourists and experts so that none of them is favored throughout the assessment process. The model has been successfully applied plenty of times for the assessment of several geosites in Serbia [1,15,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60], Slovenia [16], USA [52,61] and in the Hungarian Bakony-Balaton geopark [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new methodology has its roots in previous assessment models and studies, all mainly related to resources such as geoheritage [4,[38][39][40][41][42], spas and hot springs [43] and cultural heheritage [44][45][46][47][48], and their use for tourism. These methods have been succesfully applied numerous times in the assessment of various geosites [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68], spas [43,[69][70][71], and sites of cultural heritage [44,47,48]. The majority of tourism related subindicators were derived from these existing models and been adapted in this study for saline soil assessment, while the subindicators Geomorphological attractiveness, Pedodiversity, Biodiversity, Endemic and relict plant species and Ambience were introduced by the authors of this paper, based on the opinion of experts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%