2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the potential effect of paricalcitol on markers of inflammation in de novo renal transplant recipients

Abstract: Following a successful renal transplantation circulating markers of inflammation may remain elevated, and systemic inflammation is associated with worse clinical outcome in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Vitamin D-receptor (VDR) activation is postulated to modulate inflammation and endothelial function. We aimed to explore if a synthetic vitamin D, paricalcitol, could influence systemic inflammation and immune activation in RTRs. Newly transplanted RTRs were included in an open-label randomized controlled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paricalcitol treatment was observed to significantly decrease serum levels of IL-6, TNF, and TGF-βin kidney transplant recipients with secondary hyperparathyroidism or proteinuria. However, it was also noted that circulating high sensitivity CRP and a range of cytokines and inflammatory molecules were not significantly affected by paricalcitol treatment in this population ( 28 31 ). The network of inflammatory cytokines and molecules is intricate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Paricalcitol treatment was observed to significantly decrease serum levels of IL-6, TNF, and TGF-βin kidney transplant recipients with secondary hyperparathyroidism or proteinuria. However, it was also noted that circulating high sensitivity CRP and a range of cytokines and inflammatory molecules were not significantly affected by paricalcitol treatment in this population ( 28 31 ). The network of inflammatory cytokines and molecules is intricate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%