Interventions: None
Measurements and Main Results:We applied NEWS and 44 sets of MET criteria to a database of 2,245,778 vital signs sets (103,998 admissions). NEWS' performance was assessed using the area under the receiveroperating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC) and compared with sensitivity/specificity for the different MET criteria. AUROC (95% CI) for NEWS for the combined outcome (i.e., death, cardiac arrest or unanticipated ICU admission) was 0.88 (0.88 -0.88). A NEWS value of 7 had sensitivity/specificity values of 44.5%/97.4%.For the 44 sets of MET criteria studied, sensitivity ranged from 19.6% to 71.2%, and specificity from 71.5% to 98.5%. For all outcomes, the position of the NEWS ROC curve was above and to the left of all MET criteria points, indicating better discrimination. Similarly, the positions of all MET criteria points were above and to the left of the NEWS efficiency curve, indicating higher workloads (trigger rates).
Conclusions:When MET systems are compared to a NEWS value of >7, some MET systems have a higher sensitivity than NEWS values of >7. However, all of these MET systems have a lower specificity and would generate greater workloads.