2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-5157-1_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Performance of Ensemble Machine Learning Classifiers for Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Tweets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the results in the literature in the accuracy of sentiment classification using social media data via ML techniques, which typically ranges from 70% to 85% [36][37][38][39][40], our classification accuracy rates are among the best, if not the best.…”
Section: Sentiment Classificationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Compared to the results in the literature in the accuracy of sentiment classification using social media data via ML techniques, which typically ranges from 70% to 85% [36][37][38][39][40], our classification accuracy rates are among the best, if not the best.…”
Section: Sentiment Classificationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In this study, three different ensemble Machine Learning models are proposed to classify the data of approximately 12 thousand tweets in the UK into three emotion tags. First, the stacking classifier gave the highest F1 score of 83.5%, while in the second model the voting classifier gave 83.3% and in the last model the bagging classifier gave 83.2% results [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Others have investigated the public's opinion and awareness of COVID-19 related events (e.g., protests against lockdown, vaccination, and university reopening) and speeches/comments of political leaders (e.g., Donald Trump) ( Hu et al, 2021 , Jang et al, 2021 ). Current studies have been conducted in several countries such as the U.S. ( Jang et al, 2021 , Lyu et al, 2021 ), the U.K. ( Cheng et al, 2021 , Rahman and Islam, 2022 ), Australia ( Ewing and Vu, 2021 , Wang et al, 2022 ), India ( Barkur and Vibha, 2020 ), China ( Li et al, 2020a , Wang et al, 2020a ), Europe ( Kruspe et al, 2020 ), as well as across multiple countries ( Boon-Itt and Skunkan, 2020 , Matošević and Bevanda, 2020 , Rowe et al, 2021 ). Existing studies focus predominantly on solely English-based content, while a smaller proportion uses either content that is in Chinese and retrieved from Weibo (the largest social media platform in China) ( Li et al, 2020a , Wang et al, 2020a ) or non-verbal content (e.g., emoticons) ( Yamamoto et al, 2014 ); scarce attention has been allotted to sentiment analysis involving multilingual content (discussed in Section 4.1.2 ).…”
Section: Current Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%