2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1478951519000038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the perception of survivors on the bidirectional impact between cancer and their social contexts: A mixed-methods approach

Abstract: ObjectiveThe purpose of the current study was to use a mixed-methods approach to assess the perspective of cancer survivors on the bidirectional impact between cancer and their social contexts.MethodA fixed concurrent triangulation mixed-methods survey design was used with open- and closed-ended questions that were predetermined and administered to participants. Quantitative items included demographic questions and the Life Impact Checklist. Qualitative questions were designed to explore the bidirectional impa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Institute of Medicine describes patient-centered care as “providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions” (Institute of Medicine, 2001). For many patients, this undoubtedly includes R&S beliefs and practices (Palmer Kelly et al, 2019 a ; Merath et al, 2019). This facet of a patient's life is, however, often overlooked despite increased recognition of its importance from organizations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (Pargament et al, 2004; Puchalski et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Institute of Medicine describes patient-centered care as “providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions” (Institute of Medicine, 2001). For many patients, this undoubtedly includes R&S beliefs and practices (Palmer Kelly et al, 2019 a ; Merath et al, 2019). This facet of a patient's life is, however, often overlooked despite increased recognition of its importance from organizations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (Pargament et al, 2004; Puchalski et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be in part due to patient R&S beliefs before their cancer diagnosis. Specifically, patients with R&S beliefs before a cancer diagnosis may use them as a positive means to cope with their diagnosis and treatment (Palmer Kelly et al, 2019; Puchalski, 2012). Current research on patients with terminal or advanced cancer diagnosis has suggested that as many as 40% of individuals reported a stronger commitment to their religious beliefs or renewed spirituality in the year before their death (Puchalski et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research on patients with terminal or advanced cancer diagnosis has suggested that as many as 40% of individuals reported a stronger commitment to their religious beliefs or renewed spirituality in the year before their death (Puchalski et al, 2006). It is less likely that patients report adapting R&S beliefs as a reaction to a cancer diagnosis if those beliefs were not present pre‐diagnosis (Merath et al, 2019; Palmer Kelly et al, 2019). Continuing to understand how patient R&S beliefs and needs may evolve across the cancer care trajectory, as well as how providers can assess and adapt their approach to patients changing needs, will be important to improving spiritual care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%