1995
DOI: 10.1002/bip.360370609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the peptide 310‐helix ⇆ α‐helix equilibrium with double label electron spin resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several such side chain interactions can be identified in the alamethicin ␣-helical starting structure (not shown), but these do not induce complete transition of ␣-helical hydrogen bonding to 3 10 helix. While recent studies with spin-labeled peptides has suggested that 3 10 -helical conformations may make a greater contribution to the structures of isolated helical polypeptides than previously thought (Fiori and Millhauser, 1995), alamethicin (and melittin) retains a largely ␣-helical conformation throughout the simulations. If the dominant polypeptide helical structure was 3 10 helix, its extent should be maximized in peptides in nonaqueous solution (like methanol) where the extra intramolecular helical hydrogen bond is favored.…”
Section: Figure 11mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several such side chain interactions can be identified in the alamethicin ␣-helical starting structure (not shown), but these do not induce complete transition of ␣-helical hydrogen bonding to 3 10 helix. While recent studies with spin-labeled peptides has suggested that 3 10 -helical conformations may make a greater contribution to the structures of isolated helical polypeptides than previously thought (Fiori and Millhauser, 1995), alamethicin (and melittin) retains a largely ␣-helical conformation throughout the simulations. If the dominant polypeptide helical structure was 3 10 helix, its extent should be maximized in peptides in nonaqueous solution (like methanol) where the extra intramolecular helical hydrogen bond is favored.…”
Section: Figure 11mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The experiments presented below involve detection of spin-spin interaction in mutants of T4L containing two nitroxide side chains. As discussed below, the primary mechanisms of spin-spin interaction in the cases considered here are weak through-space exchange (Fiori et al, 1993;Fiori & Millhauser, 1995), static-dipolar (Farahbakhsh et al, 1995;Rabenstein & Shin, 1995), and modulation of the dipolar interaction by molecular tumbling (Abragam, 1961), each of which leads to distance-dependent broadening of the EPR spectrum in an isotropic distribution of nitroxides. Such spectral broadening due to spin-spin interaction is readily detected by an amplitude decrease (and line width increase) in the EPR spectrum of the doubly labeled mutant with respect to the sum of the EPR spectra of the single mutants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower limit for reliable distance determination using the above methods is given by the increasing influence of exchange interaction with decreasing inter-spin distances due to partial overlap of the nitrogen π-orbitals of the two interacting nitroxides. This effect makes quantification of inter-spin distances of less than 0.8 nm difficult (48,49). In particular, a simplified inter-spin distance determination using the difference of spectral second moments…”
Section: Inter-nitroxide Distance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%