Exploring the Negative and Gap-Widening Effects of EdTech on Young Children’s Learning Achievement: Evidence from a Longitudinal Dataset of Children in American K–3 Classrooms

Abstract

Introducing educational technology (EdTech) into school classrooms constitutes one of the strongest educational reforms of recent decades worldwide, and as a discursive or ideological background of it, there has been the optimistic consensus on the use of EdTech among the global education community. In this context, this study highlights the dark side of EdTech and provides an opportunity for critical self-reflection of its current use through a series of quantitative analyses on a longitudinal dataset of children in K–3 American classrooms collected during the first half of the 2010s (ECLS-K:2011). In this process, two adverse effects of EdTech on young children’s learning achievement are identified: the negative effect and the gap-widening effect. These findings convey the crucial message that the education community’s approaches to EdTech should be more prudent than the current optimistic consensus. These findings do not lead us to any extreme or rigid conclusion such as techno-determinism or neo-Luddism, but rather call for a balanced and realistic deliberation on the benefits and risks of technology. This point is particularly worth clarifying in the recent situation, where schools’ dependence on EdTech has inevitably increased in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kompetensi Strategis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika

“…Kompetensi strategis mencerminkan pemahaman siswa tentang masalah dan membantu mereka mendapatkan solusi pemecahan masalah yang tepat (Barham, 2020). Kompetensi strategis mengacu pada aktivitas mental siswa untuk memecahkan masalah matematika serta memilih solusi yang paling efektif untuk masalah tersebut (Ahn, 2022).…”

Ambivalences of Technological Literacy and Cognitive Growth: A Learning Classroom Dynamic in the Disruptive Era

“…This is not about how technology provides a more modern or advanced style in the teachinglearning process in the classroom, but it has touched a crucial tangent line to discuss that technological advances actually weaken the strength and potential of students. We can see how Wikipedia has become a source of knowledge, applications on smartphones such as iPhones, and all, making students and university students weak in thinking and processing the messages they receive (Ahn, 2022;Alfehaid, 2014;Gaspard et al, 2016). Technological literacy creates many innovations and facilitates access to learning and paradoxically, with all its consequences, it creates an equally big problem: knowledge degradation.…”

Centering Student Voice in Developing Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence–Embedded Supports

“…However, there is much peril along with the promise of these technologies: instructors cannot easily tell whether the work submitted by students represents solely their own thinking or if it was aided by AI. It has been demonstrated, too, that AI can contribute to widening equity gaps due to bias inherent in algorithms as well as to equity gaps in access to and use of this powerful technology (Ahn, 2022;Alonso et al, 2020).…”