Exploring the nature of governance at the level of implementation for health system strengthening: the DIALHS experience

Abstract

Health system governance has been recognized as a critical element of the health system strengthening agenda. To date, health governance research often focuses at national or global levels, adopting a macro-perspective that deals with governance structures, forms and principles. Little attention has been given to a micro-perspective which recognizes the role of health system actors in governance, or to considering the operational level of the health system. This article presents a South African case study of an intervention to address conflict in roles and responsibilities between multiple actors supporting service delivery at the local level, and explores the broader insights this experience generates about the nature of local health system governance. In an embedded case study, action learning and reflection theory were used to design and implement the intervention. Data in this article were drawn from minutes, observations and recorded reflections of the meetings and workshops that comprised the intervention. A theoretical governance framework was used both to understand the context of the intervention and to analyse the dimensions of governance relevant in the experience. The study shows how, through action learning and reflection, local managers in two organizations came to understand how the higher level misalignment of organizational structures and processes imposed governance constraints on them, and to see the impact this had on their organizational relationships. By re-framing the conflict as organizational, they were then able to create opportunities for staff to understand their context and participate in negotiating principles for communication and collaborative work. The result reduced conflict between staff in the two organizations, leading to improved implementation of programme support. Strengthening relationships among those working at local level by building collaborative norms and values is an important part of local health system governance for improved service delivery by multiple actors.

At the coalface of collaborative mental health care: A qualitative study of governance and power in district‐level service provision in South Africa

“…Importantly, the complexities and different facets of power dynamics that underwrite attempts towards integrated mental health care are showcased, adding to growing literature on the social mechanisms that influence collaboration. The study confirms and expands on previous studies of the crucial role of health system governance in South African settings, and, importantly, illuminates the role of power in integration and fragmentation of mental health services …”

Factors Influencing Governance of Orphanage: A Case Study on Zila Parishad Satkhira in Bangladesh

“…It has also noticed that they do not want to change their organizational culture of violating government rules and regulations. Scott et al (2014) have found through action learning that how the misalignment of organizational configuration, culture and processes affects the governance performance and the findings of the present study were aligned with that of the nature of governance of the orphanage and Zila Parishad.…”

Crises and Resilience at the Frontline—Public Health Facility Managers under Devolution in a Sub-County on the Kenyan Coast

“…We also draw on the distinction made by Ortiz Aragon and others ( Fig 2 ) between three interacting dimensions of organisational capacity: the hardware of infrastructure, technology and funding levels; the tangible software of knowledge, skills and processes of decision making; and the intangible software of relationships, communication practices, values and norms. The intangible features have been argued to be particularly important in shaping the behaviours of those working in an organisation and to underpin that organisations’ “power to perform” [ 16 , 17 ].…”